I am working on a module for Apache 1.3 (upgrading to 2.x is not an
option at the moment) where I want to, for each Apache child process
that spawns, open a file, and keep that file open for reading for the
life of the child process. The API document describes a pchild pool
that sounds exa
On 01/29/2008 10:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>> Oops. My fault. We need to continue in the loop, but I guess we can do
>> the following to avoid an unneeded strncasecmp
>>
>
> Huh? If real isn't a balancer, then we drop to the orig
> imp
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Oops. My fault. We need to continue in the loop, but I guess we can do
the following to avoid an unneeded strncasecmp
Huh? If real isn't a balancer, then we drop to the orig
impl. If it is, then we try to find the right worker
and, when we f
On 01/29/2008 09:59 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/29/2008 03:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Author: jim
>>> Date: Tue Jan 29 06:26:20 2008
>>> New Revision: 616335
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=616335&view=r
On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/29/2008 03:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Jan 29 06:26:20 2008
New Revision: 616335
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=616335&view=rev
Log:
Now let things like
ProxyPassReverse /foo balancer://bar
work "
On 01/29/2008 03:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Tue Jan 29 06:26:20 2008
> New Revision: 616335
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=616335&view=rev
> Log:
> Now let things like
>
>ProxyPassReverse /foo balancer://bar
>
> work "as expected" :) :)
I guess it may
I'm running the patch for one week on a production server, and it works
perfectly (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=611483).
When using Apache as a reverse proxy, the chroot environment is totally
empty (except libgcc_s.so.1).
Could we include this in next build ?
As it is very li
MSBuild and VCBuild *are* command line apps. They are specifically
Made to be used in automated builds.
The difference is, that the syntax is not like make.
G
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:21 AM
To: dev@httpd.apa
I think it will be all right provided the feature is disabled by
default and, as you say, the potential security issue is documented.
On Jan 28, 2008 1:28 PM, Akins, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/28/08 4:35 AM, "Ivan Ristic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FastCGI process is likely to b
Garrett Serack wrote:
This is certainly something we can examine during the appcompat lab.
There is still tools for building from the command line, (MSBuild,
VCBuild), but they aren’t much like make... more like Ant.
I am always trying to use NMake on those platforms.
Command line tools are ve
10 matches
Mail list logo
