Michael B Allen wrote:
I have a customer who very occasionally sees apache workers hang. I'm
pretty sure this is caused by an errant module but I don't know which
one.
Is there any way to determine which module is causing Apache workers to hang?
Can I temporarily disable that SIGTERM so that I
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
I have a customer who very occasionally sees apache workers hang. I'm
pretty sure this is caused by an errant module but I don't know which
one.
Is there any way to determine which module is causing
Michael B Allen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
I have a customer who very occasionally sees apache workers hang. I'm
pretty sure this is caused by an errant module but I don't know which
one.
Is there any way to
Michael B Allen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
I have a customer who very occasionally sees apache workers
Michael B Allen wrote:
Can I temporarily disable that SIGTERM so that I can have enough time
to attach GDB to the hanging processes?
Mike,
The code which sends the SIGTERM is in mpm_common.c:
static int reclaim_one_pid(pid_t pid, action_t action)
{
...
case SEND_SIGTERM:
/* ok, now
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Chris Kukuchka chr...@sequoiagroup.com wrote:
Michael B Allen wrote:
Can I temporarily disable that SIGTERM so that I can have enough time
to attach GDB to the hanging processes?
Mike,
The code which sends the SIGTERM is in mpm_common.c:
static int
Hi,
Can someone point me to the official announcement page for 2.2.14 ?
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html still refers
to 2.2.13 version !
Thanks,
Seema.
Seema Alevoor wrote:
Can someone point me to the official announcement page for 2.2.14 ?
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html still refers
to 2.2.13 version !
It looks like the same svnpubsub breakage that happened on apr has also
happened on httpd, will pass your message on
Michael Felt wrote:
my bad - my AddHandler statement was outside the IFModule block (at line
69, near the LoadModules, and it worked for years because mod_mime was
built-in) - so the problem I was having was primarily a user error.
What might be a build issue is all the missing LoadModule
Brian J. France wrote:
mod_dav_acl would use the filename to validate the acls. Like I said, I
don't know if get_pathname is needed or we should just use r-filename
and make sure a mod_dav_fs_db module updated it.
As Joe points out, an ACL could refer to something that wasn't a file,
such as
On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume
head of apr 1.4...
You've made 'reservations' a number times in the past several years
in STATUS, and
on list, that weren't realized for 1+
On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume
head of apr 1.4...
-1 veto; that is not released code, and I'm not fond of the idea of
a fork
of apr managed at httpd.
Who said anything
On 15.10.2009 21:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume
head of apr 1.4...
+1
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yes, I know all that. But the reason I do this is to see if there
is any sort of support behind this... I've I make this proposal and
don't see any +1s, then it leaves me to believe that most people
aren't so interested in doing so, which makes me wonder why.
So
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So speaking for myself, I am interested.
As am I.
In fact, if everything builds at the moment against 1.3.x apr (irrespective
of whether or not all features are enabled) I'm likely to just tag on Sunday
or Monday, and give testers something to start chewing on,
Hi,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
To put this into perspective, checking an md5 (or sha1) checksum is
simply a case of doing the following three steps:
- Run md5sum, or openssl, or perl, or whatever you want, and get the md5
hash string of the binary you downloaded printed out to your terminal.
Guenter Knauf wrote:
if the reference hash file from www.apache.org is build with gpg then
this method fails (and I consider gpg really unusable for this purpose);
here are some bad samples which show that gpg breaks lines if the
this looks really horrible to me (and I'm curious if some sed
The mod_info test (t/modules/info.t) asks Apache::Test::config() for a
list of modules. It then expects each of those modules to be reported
by mod_info. But some of those modules are not actually loaded
because of modules which are skipped by TestConfigParse.pm
#XXX mod_jk requires
18 matches
Mail list logo
