Re: Reducing number of mod_lua hook directives

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: >>> ... >>> >>> to >>> >>> LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua  funcname >>> LuaHook AuthChecker   /path/to/script.lua  funcname >>> LuaHook CheckUserID   /path/to/script.lua  funcnam

Re: Solving util_mutex pain?

+1 from me tests good (thx for the reminder ping!) On May 10, 2010, at 4:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 5/4/2010 2:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> Here's a backport vote to 2.2 for your consideration; >> >> It is far too painful to adopt the new Mutex directive for modules targe

Re: Solving util_mutex pain?

On 5/4/2010 2:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Here's a backport vote to 2.2 for your consideration; > > It is far too painful to adopt the new Mutex directive for modules targeting > httpd 2.2 and future 2.3. The solution, I believe, is to provide the mutex > directive for all developers to u

Re: Reducing number of mod_lua hook directives

On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: >> ... >> >> to >> >> LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname >> LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname >> LuaHook CheckUserID /path/to/script.lua funcname Any reason not to name the func before the script, especially since

Re: Reducing number of mod_lua hook directives

+1 ~Jorge On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Brian McCallister > wrote: > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier wrote: > >> mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files > >> with Lua code (LuaHookX)

Re: Reducing number of mod_lua hook directives

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier wrote: >> mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files >> with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using >> inline Lua code ().  Most of th

Re: Reducing number of mod_lua hook directives

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier wrote: > mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files > with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using > inline Lua code ().  Most of the code to implement these > is common. > > I think it'd be easie

Re: FixedInTrunk keyword?

On 5/10/2010 1:28 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all. > I found this document today stating the following: > Each developer is responsible for notifying the mailing list and > adding an action item to STATUS when they have an idea for a new feature > or major change to propose for the product.

Re: FixedInTrunk keyword?

Hi, all. I found this document today stating the following: Each developer is responsible for notifying the mailing list and adding an action item to STATUS when they have an idea for a new feature or major change to propose for the product. Since I am not a committer, how would I go about h

[SPAM] test + apology

Spam detection software, running on the system "heartofgold.mirimar.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for

[SPAM] Re: Reducing number of mod_lua hook directives

Spam detection software, running on the system "heartofgold.mirimar.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for

Reducing number of mod_lua hook directives

mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using inline Lua code (). Most of the code to implement these is common. I think it'd be easier to understand - and document - the module if we cut these down

mod_include.c with ap_rflush

Hi, I have developed an tested a mod_include.c improvement (httpd 2.2.15). The module can now handle the "include uvirtual" command, where "uvirtual" means "unbuffered". If command is "include virtual" and 200 OK there is a call to ap_rflush(r). I had this idea because is useful to send chunk

mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts

We have a setup that uses an in-house module which works not entirely unlike mod_vhost_alias, in that it has a single virtual host configured, and then determines stuff like domain name, docroot, etc, from the request. We'd love to be able to use SSL in this setup, but as far as I can see, the