Hey,
I downloaded the latest windows msi (with ssl) because I had no time
to manually compile.
I noticed mod_reqtimeout.so is missing but it is available in the
default httpd.conf
Maybe it should be removed (or the module included) so users don't
accidentally enable it.
Well, if it something
Response as requested ;)
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 06:16:14PM -, William Rowe wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Tue Oct 5 18:16:14 2010
@@ -177,11 +177,14 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
PR: 43857
Trunk
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:50:48AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
I've no strong objection to this but it deserves a comment in the code
describing why that apr_pool_clear call is redundant; a thorough
^NOT redundant
Stefan:
This is PR 49437.
crypt_data is a bit more than 128K on my Linux box.
Yup, mine too, my bad -- typing while tired.
Any opinions how this could be improved?
- use malloc/free instead. This may be bad for performance (e.g.
glibc's malloc will use mmap/munmap by default for blocks
On 10/7/2010 12:16 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Thu Oct 7 17:16:44 2010
New Revision: 1005531
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005531view=rev
Log:
backport of r1005529:
Document that a ThreadStackSize of 128K or lower will crash on Linux and
recommend at least 200K
On 07.10.2010 10:45, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Hey,
I downloaded the latest windows msi (with ssl) because I had no time
to manually compile.
I noticed mod_reqtimeout.so is missing but it is available in the
default httpd.conf
Bill: I just verified this by unpacking the MSI. Jeff added building
On 10/7/2010 12:37 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 07.10.2010 10:45, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Hey,
I downloaded the latest windows msi (with ssl) because I had no time
to manually compile.
I noticed mod_reqtimeout.so is missing but it is available in the
default httpd.conf
Bill: I just verified
On 07.10.2010 20:23, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/7/2010 12:37 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 07.10.2010 10:45, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Hey,
I downloaded the latest windows msi (with ssl) because I had no time
to manually compile.
I noticed mod_reqtimeout.so is missing but it is available in
On 10/7/2010 2:29 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Oct 7 19:29:25 2010
New Revision: 1005584
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005584view=rev
Log:
Pick up CVE-2010-1623 with this enhancement. One more pair of eyeballs
please?
Modified:
On 10/7/2010 4:52 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Thu Oct 7 21:52:56 2010
New Revision: 1005646
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005646view=rev
Log:
relatively new mod_reqtimeout needs to get in sync with various trunk fixes
I didn't see you listed on the
After some discussion on list about the numbering and quality of mod_ftp
today, it seems this is an appropriate time to consider GA, candidate
tarballs are up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ - so please
vote...
+/-1
[ ] Release mod_ftp 1.0.0 as GA
On 10/6/2010 5:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 10/5/2010 8:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/5/2010 5:41 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
All;
With the talk about a 2.2.17 coming soon, I would very much like to get
the remaining
requisite votes and implementation of the patch (48939 -
~Jorge
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
After some discussion on list about the numbering and quality of mod_ftp
today, it seems this is an appropriate time to consider GA, candidate
tarballs are up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ -
~Jorge
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Jorge Schrauwen
jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote:
~Jorge
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
After some discussion on list about the numbering and quality of mod_ftp
today, it seems this is an appropriate
14 matches
Mail list logo
