On 19 Mar 2011, at 00:02, Dan Poirier wrote:
> At some point, do we declare a feature-freeze for what will be 2.4.0?
Features can be added during a release.
We will of course need an MMN-major freeze, which is the branch's
promise of API/ABI back-compatibility. But we can still also add
to the
On Fri. 2011-03-18 at 04:01 PM EDT, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> My hopes are that if people are really wanting to invent and collaborate
> on cool stuff, that they don't wait until a f2f event that the vast
> majority of current httpd developers will not be attending and
> will instead try to start st
On March 18, 2011 18:07 , "William A. Rowe Jr."
wrote:
It seems like mod_fcgid has made huge progress and is now in a much
more stable bugfix epoch of it's life, similar to how mod_proxy had
progressed when development was kicked out of core for major http/1.1
rework, and brought back in when a
It seems like mod_fcgid has made huge progress and is now in a much
more stable bugfix epoch of it's life, similar to how mod_proxy had
progressed when development was kicked out of core for major http/1.1
rework, and brought back in when a vast percentage of it's bugs had
been addressed.
Do we wa
I've created a patch to add support for the ProxyErrorOverride
directive to mod_proxy_fcgi:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913
Could someone review this patch, please, and get back to me with
feedback and/or requests for changes? It's not important to me to have
this f
On 3/18/2011 9:24 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the
> Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it
> *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users.
Quite honestly, this leaves me with a taste to sim
On 3/18/2011 3:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> My hopes are that if people are really wanting to invent and collaborate
> on cool stuff, that they don't wait until a f2f event that the vast
> majority of current httpd developers will not be attending and
> will instead try to start stuff now-ish i
On Mar 17, 2011, at 4:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/17/2011 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 01 March 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> This is our first
On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Win
Thank you for your prompt reply! And your two fine suggestions.
On 18/03/11 11:45, Nick Kew wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2011, at 10:22, PlagiaTUM wrote:
>> With a little profiling we found out that authentication is done
>> for every subrequest, of which mod_autoindex uses plenty.
>
> You have two good so
after gathering pages of scribbles from comparing
2.2.x/modules<->2.3.x/modules and 2.2.x/include<->2.3.x/include for
API changes and trying to describe as many as I could, I'm left with a
list of things to research further:
check_user_id->check_authn
access_checker->check_access
auth_checker->che
On 03/18/2011 05:19 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
If I read this right, this is a similar issue to what we have in the
Python world with some Python extension modules on Windows.
One discussion thread about it can be found at:
http://psycopg.lighthou
On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the
> Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it
> *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users.
>
> PHP5.3.6 was just released, and the Windows
On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
stable-ABI builds
+1
Do
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
>> binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
>> stable-ABI builds
>>
>
> +1
Doing that without suggesting
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
stable-ABI builds
+1
Regards
--
^TM
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't think we should ever point to third party httpd downloads.
>> Let those offering binaries compete in the same way as Ubuntu, Fedora,
>> etc.
>> I think in general that the Apac
On 03/18/2011 04:12 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
What would it take, from our side or from Stefan's, to make it ok for us to say "go
here for Windows binaries"? It surely seems that this would be a big win for both of
us.
AFAICT they do not pro
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> I don't think we should ever point to third party httpd downloads.
> Let those offering binaries compete in the same way as Ubuntu, Fedora,
> etc.
> I think in general that the Apache-on-Windows user community offers up
> a relatively small a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the
> Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it
> *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users.
>
> PHP5.3.6 was just released, and th
Hey guys,
I'm sort of new to this list ( been reading the emails for a while now). At the
moment I would think it would be easiest to just add a note to the Apache
Wikipedia page for the http server, maybe in the developer or PHP section.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
- Reply message
I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP
world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our
problem to me, and to many of our users.
PHP5.3.6 was just released, and the Windows binaries are built with VC9,
meaning that it won't
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:11:36 +0100 Guenter Knauf wrote:
GK> Hi Ted,
GK> Am 01.03.2011 21:06, schrieb Ted Zlatanov:
>> Sorry if this has been discussed before. I couldn't find past mentions
>> after searching the archives. If there's a better way than what I'm
>> suggesting, please let me know.
On 18 Mar 2011, at 10:22, PlagiaTUM wrote:
> Dear List!
>
> We are trying to use mod_autoindex on an access-restricted web server
> with lots of directories. Our AuthN is costly (we are using
> mod_auth_external). With ~ 700 directories, the generation of the index
> takes > 1 minute.
>
> With
Dear List!
We are trying to use mod_autoindex on an access-restricted web server
with lots of directories. Our AuthN is costly (we are using
mod_auth_external). With ~ 700 directories, the generation of the index
takes > 1 minute.
With a little profiling we found out that authentication is done
25 matches
Mail list logo
