Paul,
Am 12.09.2011 02:49, schrieb Paul Querna:
Oops, that would actually be r1167603, dropped off the last character somewhere.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Infra has upgraded eos, aka the main webserver for *.apache.org to
2.3.15-dev-r116760
any thoughts about upgrad
On 9/12/2011 5:01 PM, Luke Meyer wrote:
>> From: Noel Butler [mailto:noel.but...@ausics.net]
>> The last thing that needs to be done is make announcement when the mirrors
>> may not have synced, hence Bill's 24 hr mirror clock update time allowance
>> comment, have patience.
>
> I think the mir
On 9/12/2011 5:01 PM, Luke Meyer wrote:
>> From: Noel Butler [mailto:noel.but...@ausics.net]
>> The last thing that needs to be done is make announcement when the mirrors
>> may not have synced, hence Bill's 24 hr mirror clock update time allowance
>> comment, have patience.
>
> I think the mir
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:01 -0700, Luke Meyer wrote:
> > From: Noel Butler [mailto:noel.but...@ausics.net]
> > The last thing that needs to be done is make announcement when the mirrors
> > may not have synced, hence Bill's 24 hr mirror clock update time allowance
> > comment, have patience.
>
> From: Noel Butler [mailto:noel.but...@ausics.net]
> The last thing that needs to be done is make announcement when the mirrors
> may not have synced, hence Bill's 24 hr mirror clock update time allowance
> comment, have patience.
I think the mirrors have synced on 2.2.20 long ago. Also is the
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 12:59 -0700, Luke Meyer wrote:
> Is anyone planning to announce (i.e. announce@h.a.o):
> 1. The location of the revised CVE-2011-3192 advisory
> 2. The availability of new release(s)
> ?
>
> The last thing on that list is the initial advisory, August 24.
The last thing tha
Is there any plans to fix the behavior of CacheMaxExpire to meet the
documentation? Or vice versa?
This inconsistency has been around for a long time now.
The 2.2 docs say "This maximum value is enforced even if an expiry date
was supplied with the document.", yet, it's not enforced if an Expires
h
Is anyone planning to announce (i.e. announce@h.a.o):
1. The location of the revised CVE-2011-3192 advisory
2. The availability of new release(s)
?
The last thing on that list is the initial advisory, August 24.
On 9/9/2011 11:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> which do not yet constitute ASF releases. win32-x86 binary distribution
> will follow shortly.
>
> This will be a 72 hour vote, which ends no later than Noon ET Monday
>
>
On Saturday 10 September 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >
OK, committed.
My intent is to treat reaching the admit-set limit on the number
of Ranges overlaps and/or reversals the same way we treat hitting
MaxRanges: send a 200 and the whole thing…
Sound OK?
+modules-dev : someone with a voice of authority should chime in if I (when)
say something controversial :)
I've not seen any doc on worker MPM vs prefork & event. I would love to see
that.
My observations with Worker MPM is that you will get multiple concurrent
requests on the same server_rec,
On Friday 09 September 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> [ ] Release httpd 2.2.21 as GA
+1, tested on Debian unstable with system apr
Compiling the included apr-util with ldap support on gcc 4.6 fails
because of this issue:
http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=130434034915986
But this is not a regr
> +/-1
> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.21 as GA
Reviewing Win32/64 and RHEL 5.4 32/64
14 matches
Mail list logo
