Ugg… hold up… should have used 'beta'
Will reroll… RECALLING this vote.
On Nov 8, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> --postfix dev
> On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> The 2.3.15-dev (prerelease) tarballs are avai
--postfix dev
On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> The 2.3.15-dev (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
>>
>>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-d
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The 2.3.15-dev (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-dev BETA and,
> with luck, this will be our last beta and the next releas
On 8 Nov 2011, at 23:03, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> On 11/8/2011 3:10 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > * mod_ssl's proxy support only allows one proxy client certificate per
> > frontend virtual host. Lift this restriction.
> > jim sez: Why a blocker?, pgollucci +1 jim
> > wrowe asks: wha
On 11/8/2011 5:37 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Currently in our environment we have reverse proxies connecting to
> client-cert-authenticated backends, and one of the things we can't do
> is this:
>
>
>
> ProxyPass https://some.where.back.there/foo
> ...
>
>
> ProxyPass http
On 09 Nov 2011, at 1:03 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 11/8/2011 3:10 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
* mod_ssl's proxy support only allows one proxy client certificate
per
frontend virtual host. Lift this restriction.
jim sez: Why a blocker?, pgollucci +1 jim
wrowe asks: what's the API cha
The 2.3.15-dev (prerelease) tarballs are available for download at test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as 2.3.15-dev BETA and,
with luck, this will be our last beta and the next release in ~2weeks
or less will be 2.4.0 GA!!
And we are tagged as 2.3.15…
On Nov 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK… let's polish this… "gem".
>
> I'd really like to T&R 2.3.15-dev, get some feedback quickly and
> let's push on for a quick 2.4.0 release!
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 11/8/2011 3:10 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
* mod_ssl's proxy support only allows one proxy client certificate per
frontend virtual host. Lift this restriction.
jim sez: Why a blocker?, pgollucci +1 jim
wrowe asks: what's the API change re
On 11/8/2011 3:10 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> * mod_ssl's proxy support only allows one proxy client certificate per
> frontend virtual host. Lift this restriction.
> jim sez: Why a blocker?, pgollucci +1 jim
> wrowe asks: what's the API change required?
I'm not sure I understand th
+1
On 08.11.2011 14:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> So far 3 +1s and counting…
>
> On Nov 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> OK… let's polish this… "gem".
>>
>> I'd really like to T&R 2.3.15-dev, get some feedback quickly and
>> let's push on for a quick 2.4.0 release!
+1
On 08/11/2011 14:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> So far 3 +1s and counting…
>
> On Nov 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> OK… let's polish this… "gem".
>>
>> I'd really like to T&R 2.3.15-dev, get some feedback quickly and
>> let's push on for a quick 2.4.0 release!
So far 3 +1s and counting…
On Nov 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK… let's polish this… "gem".
>
> I'd really like to T&R 2.3.15-dev, get some feedback quickly and
> let's push on for a quick 2.4.0 release!
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:10:06 +0100 (CET)
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> yesterday at the Dover Arms pub, we discussed what needs to be done for
> 2.4 and we came up with a list of things that would be nice, but are
> definitely not blockers for GA:
mod_proxy_html: I want to switch to using
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Rainer Jung wrote:
After Stefan's change r1199027 we no longer load all built modules by
default. The new behaviour is (citing Stefan):
"By default, only load those modules that are either required
or explicitly selected by a configure --enable-foo argument. The
LoadModule st
On 08.11.2011 10:03, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 11/8/2011 11:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> After Stefan's change r1199027 we no longer load all built modules by
>> default. The new behaviour is (citing Stefan):
>>
>> "By default, only load those modules that are either required
>> or explicitly
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
OK… let's polish this… "gem".
I'd really like to T&R 2.3.15-dev, get some feedback quickly and
let's push on for a quick 2.4.0 release!
+1 for tagging 2.3.15 today.
Hi,
yesterday at the Dover Arms pub, we discussed what needs to be done for
2.4 and we came up with a list of things that would be nice, but are
definitely not blockers for GA:
- fix ssl session cookie stuff (Paul volunteered)
- fix the bug in mod_authn_socache that I brought up on the list
On 11/8/2011 2:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK… let's polish this… "gem".
>
> I'd really like to T&R 2.3.15-dev, get some feedback quickly and
> let's push on for a quick 2.4.0 release!
+1 to T&R now. The concerns about constraints around pregsub only
impact 2.2.next and 2.0.65 released, not be
OK… let's polish this… "gem".
I'd really like to T&R 2.3.15-dev, get some feedback quickly and
let's push on for a quick 2.4.0 release!
Cool info… I'm (painfully) building Jenkins here locally and will
try to get a bt on the actual scenario…
On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Here is the method for the Jenkins CLI that causes all the sadness.
>> The major se
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Here is the method for the Jenkins CLI that causes all the sadness.
>> The major section is this:
>
> Thanks for the testcase!
>
> The EAGAIN is getting generated from here:
>
> static a
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fritsch [mailto:s...@sfritsch.de]
Sent: Dienstag, 8. November 2011 03:15
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1197405 - in
/httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/upgrading.xml
modules/
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Here is the method for the Jenkins CLI that causes all the sadness.
> The major section is this:
Thanks for the testcase!
The EAGAIN is getting generated from here:
static apr_status_t get_remaining_chunk_line(http_ctx_t *ctx,
On 11/8/2011 11:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> After Stefan's change r1199027 we no longer load all built modules by
> default. The new behaviour is (citing Stefan):
>
> "By default, only load those modules that are either required
> or explicitly selected by a configure --enable-foo argument. The
>
After Stefan's change r1199027 we no longer load all built modules by
default. The new behaviour is (citing Stefan):
"By default, only load those modules that are either required
or explicitly selected by a configure --enable-foo argument. The
LoadModule statements for modules enabled by --enable-
Here is the method for the Jenkins CLI that causes all the sadness.
The major section is this:
con.getOutputStream().close();
input = con.getInputStream();
// make sure we hit the right URL
if(con.getHeaderField("Hudson-Duplex")==null)
throw new IOExcept
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Fritsch [mailto:s...@sfritsch.de]
> Sent: Dienstag, 8. November 2011 03:15
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1197405 - in
> /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/upgrading.xml
> modules/filters/mod_substitute.c
>
> On Su
28 matches
Mail list logo
