reverse proxy bind backend connection to request

2013-07-23 Thread Thomas Eckert
In a reverse proxy scenario, I want to do the following 1) read incoming request A and keep it on hold 2) set up connection to backend for (new) request B 3) send request B and read response over that backend connection 4) bind that backend connection to request A so that mod_proxy will use that

Re: [PATCH] systemd socket activation

2013-07-23 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 02:14:35PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: Hiya Y'all, long time no patches :-) Attached is a patch that would let httpd use systemd's socket activation feature: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/socket-activation.html Also online here:

USD and Balancers

2013-07-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
druggeri notes that the uds support in trunk fails if used for a balancemember... Are there any reports/backtraces/etc re: this? It would be a nice thing for me to play around w/ while on vaca

Re: UDS and Balancers

2013-07-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 7/23/2013 11:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: druggeri notes that the uds support in trunk fails if used for a balancemember... Are there any reports/backtraces/etc re: this? It would be a nice thing for me to play around w/ while on vaca Jim; No, while I was testing UDS against the patches

Re: reverse proxy bind backend connection to request

2013-07-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 7/23/2013 4:31 AM, Thomas Eckert wrote: In a reverse proxy scenario, I want to do the following 1) read incoming request A and keep it on hold 2) set up connection to backend for (new) request B 3) send request B and read response over that backend connection 4) bind that backend