Re: Revisiting: xml2enc, mod_proxy_html and content compression

2013-12-18 Thread Thomas Eckert
Aha! Revisiting that, I see I still have an uncommitted patch to make content types to process configurable. I think that was an issue you originally raised? But compression is another issue. Yep. Hmmm? If the backend sends compressed contents with no content-encoding, doesn't that

Re: Question about Proxy ~ something syntax

2013-12-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 12/15/2013 11:37 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Apparently Proxy ~ xx is equivalent to ProxyMatch xx So, should we: 1) just leave it as it is. 2) remove this behavior, which has never been documented. 3) update doc. My choice is 2) because - it has never been documented,

Re: Revisiting: xml2enc, mod_proxy_html and content compression

2013-12-18 Thread Nick Kew
On 18 Dec 2013, at 14:47, Thomas Eckert wrote: No, yes and I tried but couldn't get it to work. Following your advice I went along the lines of Yes, I'd be trying something like that. You can insert inflate (and deflate) unconditionally, as they will check the headers themselves and remove

Re: Question about Proxy ~ something syntax

2013-12-18 Thread Christophe JAILLET
*r1552227*