Re: Improve Apache performance on high load (prefork MPM) with multiple Accept mutexes (Patch attached)

2015-10-27 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Monday 26 of October 2015, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote: > First, thanks Nick for the feedback. > > I have submitted https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550 as > you suggested. > > >If a threaded MPM really isn't an option (for most users the obvious > >solution), then the question is

Re: Is Apache getting too patchy?

2015-10-27 Thread Graham Leggett
On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:40 AM, Tim Bannister wrote: >> That may not be easy. You need to find someone who'll be interested in an >> idea or patch, and has the time to review it. >> Plus, the community as a whole to agree it's a good idea, or at least not >> actively

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Vctor Jos Hernndez Gmez
Hey! New message, please read Vctor Jos Hernndez Gmez

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread sameer khan
Hey! New message, please read sameer khan

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Fabian Cenedese
Hey! New message, please read Fabian Cenedese

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Andrew Beverley
Hey! New message, please read Andrew Beverley

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Melanie Pfefer
Hey! New message, please read Melanie Pfefer

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Ronaldo Zhou
Hey! New message, please read Ronaldo Zhou

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Nce Rt
Hey! New message, please read Nce Rt

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Paula Clemente
Hey! New message, please read Paula Clemente

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Jack Black
Hey! New message, please read Jack Black

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Ralph Lawrence
Hey! New message, please read Ralph Lawrence

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Scott Horsley
Hey! New message, please read Scott Horsley

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Marko Cupac
Hey! New message, please read Marko Cupac

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread alex
Hey! New message, please read a...@imaginers.org --- Phần mềm Avast antivirus đã kiểm tra virus cho email này. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Benjamin
Hey! New message, please read Benjamin

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Tal Ben-Gal
Hey! New message, please read Tal Ben-Gal

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread serfer
Hey! New message, please read serfer

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Peng Jeff
Hey! New message, please read Peng Jeff

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Frank Meier
Hey! New message, please read Frank Meier

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Mike Marchywka
Hey! New message, please read Mike Marchywka

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Nce Rt
Hey! New message, please read Nce Rt

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Stefan Hartmann
Hey! New message, please read Stefan Hartmann

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Sergey Yazikov
Hey! New message, please read Sergey Yazikov

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Vishal Agarwal
Hey! New message, please read Vishal Agarwal

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Sergey Yazikov
Hey! New message, please read Sergey Yazikov

Fw: new message

2015-10-27 Thread Thomas v Graan
Hey! New message, please read Thomas v Graan

Re: Improve Apache performance on high load (prefork MPM) with multiple Accept mutexes (Patch attached)

2015-10-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Oct 27, 2015 05:38, "Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz" wrote: > > On Monday 26 of October 2015, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote: > > First, thanks Nick for the feedback. > > > > I have submitted https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550 as > > you suggested. > > > > >If a threaded MPM

Re: Is Apache getting too patchy?

2015-10-27 Thread Jacob Champion
On 10/27/2015 03:26 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:40 AM, Tim Bannister wrote: That may not be easy. You need to find someone who'll be interested in an idea or patch, and has the time to review it. Plus, the community as a whole to agree it's a good

ap_init_rng / apr_random question

2015-10-27 Thread Eric Covener
IIUC, it takes something like 32k of /dev/random to initialize apr_random. APR_RANDOM_DEFAULT_POOLS*APR_RANDOM_DEFAULT_RESEED_SIZE*APR_RANDOM_DEFAULT_G_FOR_INSECURE (32*32*32) But ap_init_rng() does this with ~4000 8-byte reads of /dev/random. I am working on a platform where access to the

Re: svn commit: r1710723 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/cache/cache_util.h

2015-10-27 Thread Roy T. Fielding
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 11:45 PM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: jailletc36 > Date: Tue Oct 27 06:45:03 2015 > New Revision: 1710723 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1710723=rev > Log: > RFC2616 defines #rules as: > #rule > A construct "#" is defined, similar to "*", for

Re: ap_init_rng / apr_random question

2015-10-27 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > IIUC, it takes something like 32k of /dev/random to initialize apr_random. > > APR_RANDOM_DEFAULT_POOLS*APR_RANDOM_DEFAULT_RESEED_SIZE*APR_RANDOM_DEFAULT_G_FOR_INSECURE > (32*32*32) > > But ap_init_rng() does this with