Re: Moderations for modules.apache.org

On 11/9/2015, 1:54:59 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 09 Nov 2015, at 2:41 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > You're welcome to try to clean it up ;) > > make a user account on the system and give me the UID of that user (the > > ID, not the username - there

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

Am 11.10.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 11.10.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 11.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Google only showed discussions, Bugzilla and so on and finding the new

Re: Moderations for modules.apache.org

I'm a bit slow this morning. I'm sitting here, using Pony Mail for replying, not realizing...we should use OAuth for this! It would still require a wipe of the current DB, but if we use the ASF OAuth plus maybe Google OAuth for non-committers, we should be able to allow only _actual people_ to

Re: Moderations for modules.apache.org

On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 11:27 +, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Does this sound like a good idea, or complete overkill? I have long thought we might employ an alternative scheme akin to a "planet" aggregator. Make the module index an aggregator from module authors providing and maintaining their own

cppcheck warning with mod_http2

Hi, mod_http2 generates some new cppcheck warnings: modules/http2/h2_config.h 62unnecessaryForwardDeclarationstyleThe struct 'h2_config' forward declaration is unnecessary. Type struct is already declared earlier. modules/http2/h2_io_set.h 25unnecessaryForwardDeclaration