Re: Broken 2.4 ./configure

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > I put it on my TODO for friday, maybe I can conf/ifdef around it without > too much pain. > > Am 02.12.2015 um 23:16 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Reindl

Re: No H2 Window updates!

That is unfortunate. I added a test case which reproduced window exhaustion before I fixed it. What sort of requests do still miss window updates? content-length? response codes? thx. Am 04.12.2015 um 02:36 schrieb Bert Huijben : >> -Original Message- >> From: Stefan

RE: No H2 Window updates!

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 10:18 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: No H2 Window updates! > > That is unfortunate. I added a test case which reproduced window > exhaustion before I fixed it. What

Re: Broken 2.4 ./configure

mod_http2 in /trunk now checks for a minimum nghttp2 version of 1.2.1 and #ifdefs code accordingly. Will backport to 2.4.x later together with other changes. > Am 04.12.2015 um 09:19 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Stefan Eissing

Re: No H2 Window updates!

If you find the time, the lastest v1.0.10 mod_http2 in 2.4.x sets the connection window to max which addresses for me the window starvation issues I was able to reproduce (and put into my test suite). I hope this works for you as well, otherwise I'd need more detailed data on how to reproduce

Re: reverse proxy wishlist

My observation was that that the mapped pages for 2-6 fundamental socache, lbmethod or slotmem providers are the same as for a single module due to page alignment - load any two and you are already wasting kernel resources and memory. I agree that any user agent or content facing modules should

Re: reverse proxy wishlist

I thought the idea of providers and submodules were so that, for example, if someone only used byrequests, for example, they only needed to build and load that specific submodule and nothing else... Not seeing what issue exactly you're trying to address. > On Dec 3, 2015, at 6:25 PM, William A

Re: reverse proxy wishlist

afaik, we aren't tied to nghttp2, in that if there is a more viable solution and it's easier to implement/use that than, without a whole lot of work, it's something to consider. Back then, and for now, nghttp2 made the whole thing possible. If serf gets to the point where it could be used, then

RE: No H2 Window updates!

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 16:23 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: No H2 Window updates! > > If you find the time, the lastest v1.0.10 mod_http2 in 2.4.x sets the > connection window to max

RE: svn commit: r1717970 - /httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk/test/test_window_update.sh

> -Original Message- > From: ic...@apache.org [mailto:ic...@apache.org] > Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 15:26 > To: c...@httpd.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1717970 - > /httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk/test/test_window_update.sh > > Author: icing > Date: Fri Dec 4 14:25:53 2015 > New

RE: svn commit: r1717970 - /httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk/test/test_window_update.sh

> -Original Message- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 18:51 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: svn commit: r1717970 - > /httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk/test/test_window_update.sh > > > > > -Original Message- > > From:

Re: reverse proxy wishlist

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:23:24 -0600 William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > Yup, and I'm not proposing to eliminate the mechanism, I'm proposing > that the existing 'core' subset be codified in fewer, still > lightweight

Re: DER encoded cert no longer supported in 2.4 since 2.4.8

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > I did a 2.2 to 2.4 migration today. The old 2.2 server was using a > certificate file, which was DER encoded and the new 2.4 one didn't like it. > > It seems support for DER encoded certs was removed in 2.4.8 as a

Re: reverse proxy wishlist

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > > I'm looking, none of these seem like huge hacks, wondering > > which of them trigger your concern? > > Well, your talk of refactoring config led me to wonder > whether you were proposing another tilt at the whole directory

RE: No H2 Window updates! (Probably a Serf issue!)

> -Original Message- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 21:45 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: No H2 Window updates! > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > > Sent: vrijdag

RE: No H2 Window updates! (Probably a Serf issue!)

> -Original Message- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 22:27 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: No H2 Window updates! (Probably a Serf issue!) > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > >

Re: No H2 Window updates!

Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:23:19 +0100): >If you find the time, the lastest v1.0.10 mod_http2 in 2.4.x sets the >connection window to max which addresses for me the window starvation >issues I was able to reproduce (and put into my test suite). I hope this >works

Re: svn commit: r1717970 - /httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk/test/test_window_update.sh

I can certainly try more scenarios. The ones there in the tests reflect the problems I have seen and verify the fixes I did. If you have a h2load scenario that reproduces what you see, that could be very helpful. Alternatively, what would I have to do to run your test on my machine? > Am

RE: No H2 Window updates!

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 21:36 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: No H2 Window updates! > > The code increases the window by the difference between max and current > so that the client has

Re: No H2 Window updates! (Probably a Serf issue!)

Thanks for the quick update and the good news. > Am 04.12.2015 um 22:46 schrieb Bert Huijben : > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] >> Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 22:27 >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: RE: No H2 Window

Re: No H2 Window updates!

The code increases the window by the difference between max and current so that the client has exactly the max value. nghttp2 accepts this on the client side. It rejects any larger value as you described. So we seem to have a difference in calculation between nghttp2 and serf. which values do

Re: No H2 Window updates!

> Am 04.12.2015 um 20:51 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt : > > Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:23:19 > +0100): >> If you find the time, the lastest v1.0.10 mod_http2 in 2.4.x sets the >> connection window to max which addresses for me the window starvation

Re: RE: svn commit: r1717970 - /httpd/test/mod_h2/trunk/test/test_window_update.sh

unsubscribe