On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:03 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Ruediger Pluem
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 06/20/2016 07:04 PM, William A Rowe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>
>> On 06/20/2016 07:04 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> > Did we miss this build breakage fix in 2.4.22?
>>
>> I guess so, but it only
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.22 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.22 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 06/20/2016 07:04 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > Did we miss this build breakage fix in 2.4.22?
>
> I guess so, but it only should happen with --enable-mods-shared=few which
> I guess is not that common.
>
No,
Le 17/06/2016 à 14:35, Ruediger Pluem a écrit :
On 06/17/2016 02:24 PM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Hi,
The code in trunk and 2.4 don't have the 3 last lines:
memcpy(eval->gspend, sz, len + 1);
/* hspend will now point to NULL character */
eval->gspend += len;
On 06/20/2016 07:04 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Did we miss this build breakage fix in 2.4.22?
I guess so, but it only should happen with --enable-mods-shared=few which I
guess is not that common.
Regards
Rüdiger
Did we miss this build breakage fix in 2.4.22?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:29 PM, wrote:
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Fri Jun 17 18:29:16 2016
> New Revision: 174
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=174=rev
> Log:
> * If enable_proxy_hcheck is unset handle it like
Am 20.06.2016 um 15:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.22 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.22 GA.
[x] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:20:43
-0400):
>The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.22 can be found
>at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.22 GA.
>
>[ ] +1: Good to go
> Am 20.06.2016 um 15:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.22 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.22 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.22 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.22 GA.
>
> [X] +1: Good
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.22 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.22 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72
Due to a last-minute regression, I am cancelling this VOTE.
Instead, the plan is to get the regression fix approved for
backport (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1749151)
and release 2.4.22.
Thx to all testers... and keep your eyes open for the next VOTE to
come hopefully later on
Yes, I am trending the same way...
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Steffen wrote:
>
> Is a regression. Better to have the fix in GA.
>
>> Op 20 jun. 2016 om 13:51 heeft Stefan Eissing
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Yes. Everything else
Is a regression. Better to have the fix in GA.
> Op 20 jun. 2016 om 13:51 heeft Stefan Eissing
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Yes. Everything else is +1. Just this. Just wanted to express that I do not
> see it as blocking, but am not happy about it either.
>
Yes. Everything else is +1. Just this. Just wanted to express that I do not see
it as blocking, but am not happy about it either.
> Am 20.06.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> Although not required, I am curious about the +0 vote. Is it
> due totally to the non-release
Although not required, I am curious about the +0 vote. Is it
due totally to the non-release breaking bug? (the one fixed
w/ the 'h2_beam_abort(stream->input);' line added to h2_mplx.c) ?
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>
> Tested:
> (15.5.0
All fine on Windows.
On Thursday 16/06/2016 at 19:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0:
Tested:
(15.5.0 Darwin): event, prefork, worker
(14.04.1-Ubuntu, x86_64): event, worker
Vote: +0
The bug discovered by Michael Kaufmann is not release breaking for me. If we'd
find another issue, I would bring in the fix.
-Stefan
> Am 16.06.2016 um 19:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski
19 matches
Mail list logo