Re: Handle Upgrade forwarding (protocol switch) in mod_proxy_http

2016-07-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Jul 27, 2016 6:53 PM, "Yann Ylavic" wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> since Upgrade is an HTTP/1 feature, I

Re: Handle Upgrade forwarding (protocol switch) in mod_proxy_http

2016-07-27 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> since Upgrade is an HTTP/1 feature, I don't find it too twisted... >> >> The primary goal would be to let the backend

Re: Handle Upgrade forwarding (protocol switch) in mod_proxy_http

2016-07-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Yann Ylavic > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> since Upgrade is an HTTP/1 feature, I don't find it too twisted... >> >> The primary goal would be to let the backend

Re: Handle Upgrade forwarding (protocol switch) in mod_proxy_http

2016-07-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Hi, > > since Upgrade is an HTTP/1 feature, I don't find it too twisted... > > The primary goal would be to let the backend decide whether an Upgrade > is to be done, or otherwise continue with HTTP (still parsing the >

Re: svn commit: r1750953 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c

2016-07-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > 2016-07-25 14:41 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic : > >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Jacob Champion >> wrote: >> > On 07/22/2016 10:49 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> >> >>

Re: svn commit: r1750953 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_script.c

2016-07-27 Thread Luca Toscano
2016-07-25 14:41 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Jacob Champion > wrote: > > On 07/22/2016 10:49 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> > >> I'm -1 for interpretating invalid values. > > > > > > By "invalid" do you mean any string

Handle Upgrade forwarding (protocol switch) in mod_proxy_http

2016-07-27 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi, since Upgrade is an HTTP/1 feature, I don't find it too twisted... The primary goal would be to let the backend decide whether an Upgrade is to be done, or otherwise continue with HTTP (still parsing the response, filtering, caching, ...). Currently we handle WebSocket tunneling only (in

Caching PROPFIND

2016-07-27 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-2, it says the following: "However, it is also possible to cache [...] responses to methods other than GET if the method's definition allows such caching and defines something suitable for use as a cache key." Would it