Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

the SiFive RISC-V and yes ... even some old SPARCv9 stuff. I would love to be the geek running a web site on PA-RISC but that is really just being obscure on purpose :) -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

Everybody says git is decentralized, so why are you even asking this question? Can't you just use any git repository, anywhere? ;-) Github is microsoft and you can bet they will break things. It is only a matter of time with them. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC Four decades

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

service such as Microsoft github when sourcehut works just fine as does a private git repo provided by Apache FSF itself. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC Four decades in production systems.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.51-rc1 as httpd-2.4.51

On 10/7/21 11:17, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > Then I close the vote and start pushing the release. > > Thanks for everyone to participate here on such a short notice! > Well gee ... that was far too fast for me to catch! I guess I will just go get the production release. -- D

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as httpd-2.4.50

4.html However https://httpd.apache.org/ seems to still say 2.4.49 there. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as httpd-2.4.50

lar 2.4 release. > Not a problem at all. I am glad to keep that big Fujitsu/Oracle/Sun gear running and doing something useful. Given that it is under a nearly eternal support contract there is good chance that I will be testing things in that harsh POSIX compliant UNIX world for quite a while. -- De

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as httpd-2.4.50

ll give that a whirl but autoconf/autoreconf autotools madness was giving me hardship. At least last time I looked which was 1893292 about two weeks ago. Anyways 2.4.50 seems to work just fine with OpenSSL 1.1.1l for me. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as httpd-2.4.50

bw/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol ERR_GET_FUNC: referenced symbol not found beta # Not a big surprise. I shift over to a machine with the OpenSSL 1.1.1 goodness. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as httpd-2.4.50

s way in all previous releases, but > just discovered it when browsing around: The Announcement2.4.* files > says "September 21, 2018" which is odd since That is just a template. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49, PASSED

e if I can get past the essential config and compile stage. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: trunk/rc usable with OpenSSL 3.0.0 ?

On 9/13/21 04:22, Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:23:37AM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> ALL : >> >> >> I may receive no reply to this but in general I have been able to build >> Apache httpd from any release tarball as well as from tru

trunk/rc usable with OpenSSL 3.0.0 ?

the latest RC works nor does trunk. So then ... how to proceed ? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional PS: trunk 1893292 fails even autoreconf and then more horror follows

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

On 9/12/21 22:41, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 9/12/21 07:55, Bernard Spil wrote: reply to self again ... Looking in trunk I see modules/ssl/ssl_private.h : struct SSLSrvConfigRec { SSLModConfigRec *mc; ssl_enabled_tenabled; const char *vhost_id; const unsigned c

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

s trouble in paradise." due to the fact that the 2.4.49-rc1 tarball will not work out of the box with the production release of OpenSSL 3.0.0. There needs to be a fix here such that it "just works"(tm) with the latest OpenSSL. > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 7:02 AM Dennis Clarke wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

On 9/12/21 02:36, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 9/10/21 11:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: >> Hi, all; >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

opt/bw/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol ERR_GET_FUNC: referenced symbol not found beta # OpenSSL 3.0.0 was not a problem here. A few nits but nothing at all serious. Not sure where this is coming from. If this is trivial let me know. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: release roll soon?

. However recently my Apache trunk builds have been running into problems with autotools and basic configuration steps. I may reach out to the maillist regarding that. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: page https://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi says Stable Release - Latest Version:,, 2.4.46 (released 2020-08-07)

On 5/26/21 13:03, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > Le 26/05/2021 à 16:41, Dennis Clarke a écrit : >> >> Seen at https://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi >> >> Stable Release - Latest Version: >> >> 2.4.46 (released 2020-08-07) >> >>

page https://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi says Stable Release - Latest Version:,, 2.4.46 (released 2020-08-07)

different. I am guessing that all of this is in flow and changing now. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.47

On 4/22/21 7:44 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:31 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> On 4/22/21 6:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:25 AM Christophe JAILLET >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, all; >>>&

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.47

endian ? I have ppc64 big endian here running Debian Linux as well as SPARC64. Also I am working on Solaris 10 on ye Fujitsu SPARC64 as well as FreeBSD on RISC-V and a few others. This will take me some time. Hope there are more than a few days for testing. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

r1884753 httpd trunk throws configure.in:93: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR from autoconf

:93: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.in:241: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE alpha $ I don't recall seeing that before. Any thoughts ? -- Dennis Cla

Re: Inexplicable sporadic 404 & 301 responses

ng seems to have figured out but I am not there yet. I am just never fast enough these days to get in a "vote" for release or not. Thankfully we have Rainer out there. As for noisey stuff in the mailist. Hit delete. I may not be alone in that. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.43

On 2020-03-28 16:24, Gregg Smith wrote: On 3/26/2020 7:50 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.43

connection issues and am not yet sure what the problem is. May be related to : https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11378 -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.43

boxen with the recent OpenSSL 1.1.1d and a few other up to date bits. I should report in later today with this running. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: Time for 2.4.42?

On 2020-02-11 09:12, Jim Jagielski wrote: Seems like a good time to propose a release... I can RM if desired. A beta release tarball would be wonderful and then I can start test builds and see what shakes loose on the older C99 strict systems. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX

Re: the demo code can't run normally in apache 2.4.

and then report back. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: svn commit: r1860166 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/mod/ include/ modules/http2/ modules/proxy/ server/

ere in the balancer fallback case). There is corner case though Some of love to chase into dark corners and this looks like one of them. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: Migrate to git?

-worlds, why not? Call a vote such that we can all veto the idea. I could care less for a git based repo within the Microsoft owned service. There is nothing remotely wrong with subversion and "popular" is not a valid argument. Madonna was popular also. So was Lawrence Welk. -- Dennis C

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.41

ning on Solaris 10 sparcv9 with : openssl 1.1.1c apr 1.7.0 apr-util 1.6.1 libiconv-1.16 zlib-1.2.8 pcre-8.40 curl-7.65.3 ... and a pile of other stuff that likely needs to be up to date. https://beta.tls13.net/ -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs

able Runtime Utility 1.6.1 and that solves the version mystery. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs

On 8/8/19 7:41 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > As the subject says, I'd like to get on with our 2.4.new release now > that we're good to go. Will kick things off in about 24 hours Tarballs will be in the usual places ?? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Lin

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40

hen all would be well. However that is off topic. Sorry for the noises made earlier wherein I should have checked headers. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40

On 8/5/19 4:04 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 04:51:45PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> Quick reply here to let you know that the build fails instantly >> within server/config.c at func process_resource_config_cb() with >> a strange error uttered by Or

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40

On 8/4/19 4:51 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 8/3/19 9:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >>    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40

RSIVE "config.c", line 1916: error: undefined struct/union member: cb "config.c", line 1916: warning: left operand of "." must be struct/union object "config.c", line 1916: warning: improper pointer/integer combination: op "=" "config

Re: libcrurl

everywhere. My 0.02bt worth. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [COMPLETED] Migrating our wiki

endure. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: Migrating our wiki

On 5/21/19 1:00 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 21/05/2019 12.51, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 5/21/19 12:32 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Hi folks, looks like we have to migrate our moin wiki to confluence in the coming weeks. Unless there are objections, I'll file a self-serve request to start migration

Re: Migrating our wiki

, with LDAP permissions for us. Does this imply that jira is used for task tracking also? That usually travels hand in hand with confluence. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

On 3/28/19 11:48 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this >> candidate tarball as 2.4.39: > > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > All tests pass on Debian(s) 8, 9 and 10

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

On 3/28/19 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > > > >> >> Tested and passed on the following systems (no regressions): >> >> o macOS 10.14.4, Xcode 10.2 >> o CentOS 5, 64bit > > Really CentOS 5? Just asking because it does not receive further OS updates > and I wouldn't

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

On 3/27/19 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ Since there is now a release tarball can we have a week to test? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.39

a couple oddball systems to kick ( Debian arm7, FreeBSD ppc64 and ye old Solaris sparcv9 ) but don't wait to hear from me. I won't have anything building until late Thurs. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38 PASSED

votes: PMC jorton, jim, druggeri, rjung, ylavic Community Noel Butler, Dennis Clark I thank everyone for their time in testing and verifying this latest release. I will begin the process of promoting to the mirrors for sync. Dennis Clarke .. with an 'e'. At your service. Read that with a Sean

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38

On 1/20/19 6:50 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Dennis, Am 21.01.2019 um 00:34 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 1/20/19 2:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 17.01.2019 um 19:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38

On 1/20/19 2:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 17.01.2019 um 19:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38

https://corv.tls13.net/ fun. Dennis Clarke

Re: Latest test builds

On 1/19/19 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I've uploaded the latest test builds for macOS and Linux 64. These are based on ~r1851640 and include 2 main updates from the earlier one: o beanshell now included o macOS path bug should now be squashed

Re: svn commit: r1850745 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/config.m4

On 1/15/19 9:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jan 9, 2019, at 7:41 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: Personally, I'd be fine allowing c99 in both 2.4 and trunk, considering that we are in 2019 already :) Any platform that lacks a c99 compatible CC likely doesn't build

Re: Fwd: [Bug 53579] httpd looping writing on a pipe and unresponsive (httpd )

On 1/6/19 11:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: Hi all, Your project's Bugzilla database suffered some minor abuse ... *sigh* - The idiot concerned has had their account disabled. I wouldn't be opposed to merely blocking all gmail/yahoo/freebie email account type domains from ever commiting

Re: __attribute__

No ... but surely you meant to write __attribute__((packed)) Why No? And don't call me Shirley. A lot of people loved that line. For those of us that read all of this .. thank you for that early this morning. Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On 10/21/2018 08:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate

Re: httpd and php integration

On 10/18/2018 07:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 19.10.2018 um 00:46 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 10/18/2018 04:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.10.2018 um 21:55 schrieb Dennis Clarke: You debugger output shows jump = 0x101e2915c. This address is not divisible by 8, so it seems it confirms

Re: httpd and php integration

On 10/18/2018 04:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.10.2018 um 21:55 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 10/18/2018 03:42 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.10.2018 um 21:18 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 10/18/2018 02:12 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: php: "5.6.38" I do build PHP 7.x myself including rece

httpd and php integration

On 10/18/2018 03:42 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.10.2018 um 21:18 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 10/18/2018 02:12 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: php: "5.6.38" I do build PHP 7.x myself including recent library versions both on some Linux platforms as well as on Solaris Sparc. But the t

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

d made any progress with manually integrating httpd and php 7.x ?? Dennis Clarke

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.37 - about 12:00 GMT tomorrow

On 10/17/2018 03:25 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/ is what will be exported, ,/buildconf invoked, and then tarred up, if that helps you anticipate the tag a day early. It shouldn't give any different hassles than trunk. thank you,

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.37 - about 12:00 GMT tomorrow

On 10/17/2018 02:24 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2018-10-17 13:13, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 10/17/2018 07:41 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; With the fix for detected OpenSSL 1.1.1 issues now backported to 2.4.x, I would like to tag the next version of our venerable server soon. I have

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.37 - about 12:00 GMT tomorrow

On 10/17/2018 07:41 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; With the fix for detected OpenSSL 1.1.1 issues now backported to 2.4.x, I would like to tag the next version of our venerable server soon. I have already successfully completed the test suite against my "latest sources" docker

Re: svn commit: r1843478 - /httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/ssl/ocsp.t

On 10/15/2018 01:25 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 4:38 PM Dennis Clarke <mailto:dcla...@blastwave.org>> wrote: As a red herring that illustrates how oddball the situation could get : $ /usr/sfw/bin/openssl version 2>&1 | cut -f1 -d\( OpenS

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

On 10/14/2018 05:46 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, Helmut; Note that the vote may run longer than 72 hours as 72 is the minimum. As it stands now, we have more than 3 binding +1 votes, but I am waiting for closure on the conversation on-list about the tests with reported H2/TLS 1.3 failures.

Re: svn commit: r1843478 - /httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/ssl/ocsp.t

On 10/14/2018 05:45 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Dennis, just to confirm ...  is this build ocsp enabled.. Enabled and broken. At least on Solaris 10 sparc with recent patches. OpenSSL 1.1.1 works just fine. See below. OpenSSL 1.0.2n also blows up : $ /usr/bin/openssl version OpenSSL

Re: svn commit: r1841620 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/dev/verification.mdtext

On 09/21/2018 05:47 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: Hi William, can you write in here the full command to use? Didn't find the -r flag that you mentioned :( perhaps : $ /usr/local/bin/openssl version OpenSSL 1.1.1 11 Sep 2018 $ /usr/local/bin/openssl dgst -r -sha256 /usr/local/bin/openssl

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

On 09/21/2018 09:52 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: I've updated the proposed, generated announcements here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt A quick proofread would be appreciated - this should be the

Re: svn commit: r29575 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

On 09/21/2018 12:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: You may want to use this opportunity to drop md5 and sha1 hashes, you will be yelled at by ops when you attempt to publish new instances of these obsoleted hashes. In the apr release case, the announce was modded through anyways, but a

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

+1 for release and thanks for RM. Not enough time right now for the usual detailed report, but so far looks good on Solaris 10 Sparc, SLES 11+12, RHEL 6+7. Thank you for getting to it before I did. I can ignore it now ;-) Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

working on Solaris x86 or SPARC yet and I have yet to really throw myself at it. Don't let it hold anything back. I hardly see it as a large percentage of the user space anyways. I'll look at it starting later today. Dennis Clarke

Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x?

On 09/05/2018 07:36 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: A member of the OpenSSL project gave me a "go ahead" and we now have branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/tlsv1.3-for-2.4.x as a copy of 2.4.x with

Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x?

On 09/03/2018 09:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: +1! for backporting >> On Sep 3, 2018, at 5:17 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> >> Dear SSL care takers and stake holders, >> >> trunk has TLSv1.3 support for some time. TLSv1.3 is a published protocol and I see no reason why it wouldn't be

Re: 2.4.35 in Sept?

On 08/31/2018 12:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, Dennis; We took a look at that a year-ish ago, but couldn't find critical mass to release the produced candidate. Are there things in trunk you are particularly interested in? -- Thank you Daniel and yes, I have considerable interest in

Re: 2.4.35 in Sept?

On 08/31/2018 02:40 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: 2018-08-29 16:10 GMT+02:00 Jim Jagielski : Looking to maybe do an interim release in Sept... Comments? Feedback? +1 from me, looking forward to see mod-ratelimit fixed :) Are there any talks anywhere about a pre-release or "beta" of 2.5.1 or

Re: Win run success tls 1.3 with Chrome

On 07/27/18 07:29, Apache Lounge wrote: Maybe someone is interested. With initial testing: Chrome 68 with tls 1.3 draft 28 (setting in chrome://flags) OpenSSL version 1.1.1-pre8 httpd-trunk revision 1836684 Chrome Output: Connection - secure (strong TLS 1.3) The connection to this site is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.34 as GA

On 07/10/2018 10:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +1 on Solaris 10 Sparc with OpenSSL 1.1.0h Apache/2.4.34 (Unix) OpenSSL/1.1.0h Dennis ps: have not

Re: [openssl-users] Double TLS 1.3 session ticket?

On 06/20/2018 08:46 PM, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote: Thanks, it does not happen with mozzilla implementation (tls13.crypto.mozilla.org), is this openssl specific or part of the specification? The specification allows a server to send one or more tickets, at its

Re: TLS 1.3 seems to OVERwork with httpd-trunk rev 1833619

On 06/17/2018 04:35 PM, Apache Lounge wrote: Same behavior "read R BLOCK" twice  on Windows with trunk from today (1833659): Clearly there is a loop somewhere which is happening twice and may be because of some state variable not set corrected on entry to the loop. Difficult to trace.

TLS 1.3 seems to OVERwork with httpd-trunk rev 1833619

Thank you Yann Ylavic ! Sure enough no patch was needed and trunk compiles up neatly and just a bit noisey about a few odd warnings ... nothing too interesting. So then ... as I reported earlier I can get reasonable handshake and TLSv1.3 traffic with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 from the