Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.3.6-alpha Released

2010-06-22 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:21:02 UTC, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Apache HTTP Server 2.3.6-alpha Released FWIW - with a little more 'massaging' than 2.2.15 - I got this compiling on OS2. Will test if it works tomorrow if I get some free time. -- Cheers, Paul.

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-18 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Brian, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:12:11 UTC, Brian Havard wrote: > Nick Kew wrote: > > Paul Smedley wrote: > > > >>> [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk > >>> [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk > >>> > >>> (I'm +1 on both votes) &g

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-18 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:43:08 UTC, Nick Kew wrote: > Guenter Knauf wrote: > > Jeff Trawick schrieb: > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley > >> mailto:pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au>> > >> wrote: > >> Sorry for

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-18 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Graham, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:30:37 UTC, Graham Leggett wrote: > This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. > > Paul Smedley wrote: > > > Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2 > > maintainer for APR and httpd - I'

Re: Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Jeff, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:09:13 UTC, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley < > pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au> wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > >

Re: Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Guys, On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote: > * The last OS/2-specific MPM change I can find was in 2003 > (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=101826). > > Votes: > > [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk > [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk > > (I'm +1 on both votes) S

Re: modphp problems with file >=64k

2006-08-05 Thread Paul Smedley
FWIW - this turned out to be an APR problem on OS/2 in network_io/sendrecv.c On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:27:45 UTC, "Paul Smedley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'm maintaining OS/2 versions of Apache2 and PHP5. They work nicely, > except for some iss

modphp problems with file >=64k

2006-08-02 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Guys, I'm maintaining OS/2 versions of Apache2 and PHP5. They work nicely, except for some issues in modphp which I've thus far been unable to root cause. Last night I made some progress in diagnosing the problems. I got a testcase testbuffer.php as follows: block.html is a file containi

Apache2 Module handle naming convention

2006-06-03 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, I'm building Apache2 on OS/2 using GCC. On OS/2, GCC defaults to naming symbols prefaced with an underscore, ie char IMG_Load (); when compiled will be _IMG_Load. It's possible to eliminate the _ by declaring the function as type _System, ie: char _System IMG_Load (); when compiled wi

Documentation on MPM's

2006-05-08 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, Anyone have a link to some clear documentation on the MPM interface in Apache2? The MPM for OS/2 on Apache2 was originally written for the EMX compiler/library and I've updated the port to the latest GCC on OS/2 (which uses a similar approach to cygwin), however have problems with modph

modphp5 problems - but only if multiple modules are loaded in httpd.conf on OS/2

2006-04-27 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, Hoping someone might have some ideas on the following I've built the latest Apache2 (currently 2.2.2) & PHP5 (currently 5.1.2) for OS/2 and they're largely running well - with one gotcha. If modphp5.dll is the ONLY module loaded in httpd.conf, it works perfectly. If ANY other modu

Problem with modphp

2006-04-09 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, Wondering if anyone has any ideas about an unusual problem I'm seeing on OS/2 with Apache and PHP. Basically, if modphp is the only module loaded with LoadModule in httpd.conf, PHP works perfectly. If other modules are loaded in httpd.conf, simple PHP pages load OK, but more complex o

timeout problems with apache 2.2.0 and php on OS/2

2006-03-02 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, Wondering if anyone has seen something similar to this before on another platform? I have Apache 2.2.0 and PHP 4.4.2/5.1.2 built on OS/2. Apache 2.2.0 works fine, as does PHP - but only if PHP is the _only_ module loaded. If other apache modules are loaded, simple php scripts will load

Re: mod_so problem under OS/2

2005-11-28 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Jeff, On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:16:12 UTC, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/26/05, Paul Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What's happening is that it's loading all the modules that are listed > > in httpd.conf, then for some reason is t

mod_so problem under OS/2

2005-11-26 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi all, I've been trying to get Apache 2.0.55 working with the latest GCC on OS/2 (3.3.5). I have it working with statically loaded modules, but am having issues with dynamically loaded modules. What's happening is that it's loading all the modules that are listed in httpd.conf, then for some

Re: Building Apache 2.0.55

2005-11-11 Thread Paul Smedley
HI Jeff, On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:51:26 UTC, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/10/05, Paul Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm trying to get Apache2 2.0.55 building and running on OS/2 using > > GCC 3.3.5. There's a

Building Apache 2.0.55

2005-11-10 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, I'm trying to get Apache2 2.0.55 building and running on OS/2 using GCC 3.3.5. There's a current build of Apache using GCC 2.8.1 but that GCC is getting a bit long in the tooth so I'd like to update things :) Anyway, I have it building ok - using the unix network_io and poll code inste

Building 2.0.55 on OS/2

2005-10-17 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, Over the last few days I've been attempting to build Apache2 2.0.55 on OS/2 using GCC 3.3.5 Previous builds on OS/2 have been with the EMX runtime and GCC 2.8.1 Anyway, I have it building, using the unix poll & network_io code as the GCC 3,3,5 implementation is far more unix like than pr