hives.
> >
> > I have no idea why not. Any moderator of that list here?
>
> Still no sign of it in httpd-announce, the www-announce did make it.
> Any chance you had used a different email sender to httpd? You could
> try a ping to announce-owner@. Sebb would you happen
Tomcat download pages can show an old version, 9.0.46 instead of 9.0.48.
This affects both eu and us hosts.
See the following curl samples, taken one after another.
Something has gone wrong.
Sebb.
$ curl -s http://tomcat.us.apache.org/download-90.cgi | grep deployer.zip.sha512
https
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 18:34, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> $ svn info --show-item last-changed-revision $whatever
>
> I think that's what you're looking for, in a simple command.
>
However --show-item is not available in all versions of svn.
Not sure when it was added, but it's not present in 1.7.9 (as
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 at 14:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2019, 21:14 Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>> There is nothing
>> remotely wrong with subversion and "popular" is not a valid argument.
>> Madonna was popular also. So was Lawrence Welk.
>
>
> It's more nuanced than "popular". It's about
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:40, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.41:
> [ ] +1: It's
) was in 2013. I suspect the separate list could
be dropped.
This would allow B) to be dropped as well
This would simplify the SVN config considerably.
Sebb.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/quetz-mod_python-commits/200805.mbox/%3c20080506000546.0348c2388...@eris.apache.org%3e
Any comments?
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 01:02, sebb wrote:
>
> The mbox-cvs@httpd used to be used for mbox commit messages.
>
> However these now seem to be sent to cvs@
>
> AFAICT there is no need to keep the list.
>
> Agreed?
>
> S.
The mbox-cvs@httpd used to be used for mbox commit messages.
However these now seem to be sent to cvs@
AFAICT there is no need to keep the list.
Agreed?
S.
will be different.
On 26 September 2018 at 22:04, Noel Butler wrote:
> On 27/09/2018 05:37, sebb AT ASF wrote:
>
>
> I don't know if this is relevant, but the messages don't have a Date:
> header.
>
>
> A this would be because Daniel used curl to send them rather than a
> sane me
c825@%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E
https://lists.apache.org/api/source.lua/5066198082d075dcde1230262f1e273dccce72580c6da33b09077b20@%3Cdev.jmeter.apache.org%3E
So clearly the same mail was sent to both announce@a,o and dev@jmeter
(and user@)
Sebb.
>
>
On 26 September 2018 at 00:12, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Agreed it was published to ann@httpd.a.o, likely Jim's approval.
>
> It has not arrived at a...@apache.org.
>
> Sebb, can you shed any light on this moderation issue?
>
I just checked on hermes.
There are two mails fr
column.
On 9 March 2015 at 00:44, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The script that creates the committers list [1] and project list [2]
currently tries to extract URLs from the HTTPD contributors page [3].
This function relies on parsing the HTML, and the parsing currently
does not extract all
The script that creates the committers list [1] and project list [2]
currently tries to extract URLs from the HTTPD contributors page [3].
This function relies on parsing the HTML, and the parsing currently
does not extract all of the URLs.
Also, some of the URLs no longer work.
Rather than
PING?
On 21 September 2012 18:41, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI
Breaks for me too:
http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache22
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/
There appear to be no Win32 binaries for 2.23, only 2.22
BTW, 2.21 is still present; should be deleted
, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
PING?
On 21 September 2012 18:41, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI
Breaks for me too:
http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache22
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/
There appear to be no Win32 binaries for 2.23, only 2.22
BTW, 2.21 is still
FYI
Breaks for me too:
http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache22
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/
There appear to be no Win32 binaries for 2.23, only 2.22
BTW, 2.21 is still present; should be deleted as it is now rather old.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
On 14 February 2012 11:26, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 February 2012 01:25, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking into updating the JMeter release instructions to use the
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo.
Potentially also add the information to the releases FAQ [2
On 10 February 2012 01:25, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking into updating the JMeter release instructions to use the
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo.
Potentially also add the information to the releases FAQ [2] for
everyone to use.
Ping: can no-one offer help here?
AFAICT
I'm looking into updating the JMeter release instructions to use the
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo.
AIUI you use dev/httpd/ for vote staging, and then rename the files to
release/httpd/
The documentation [1] says:
*How do we make it public?*
...
The release tarballs and signatures
On 14/06/07, Dmytro Fedonin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Looking through 'server/mpm/worker/worker.c' I have found such a
combination of TODO/FIXME comments:
1)
/* TODO: requests_this_child should be synchronized - aaron */
if (requests_this_child = 0) {
2)
requests_this_child--; /* FIXME:
are duplicated (amongst others).
S///
-- Forwarded message --
From: sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 01-Apr-2007 13:24
Subject: Problems with Date view in mod_mbox?
To: Apache Infrastructure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just been looking through some of the mailing list archives (e.g.
JMeter for March
21 matches
Mail list logo
