Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:55 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..cut..]
Well the process is not quite so structured by design, but yes, I
plan to
propose we backport these into 2.0 (in time for 2.0.53) and I'll do the
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:55 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..cut..]
Well the process is not quite so structured by design, but yes, I plan to
propose we backport these into 2.0 (in time for 2.0.53) and I'll do the
backport as I have time
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:28 PM +0200 Rüdiger Plüm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..cut..]
Many thanks for the quick response. As I was curious I had a look to the cvs.
Sorry for the maybe stupid question. Do I understand this correctly: You commit the
changes to the
Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:28 PM +0200 Rüdiger Plüm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..cut..]
Many thanks for the quick response. As I was curious I had a look to the
cvs.
Sorry for the maybe stupid question. Do I understand this correctly: You
Hi all,
starting with Apache 2.0.50 I tried to use mod_cache / mod_disk_cache to cache
responses from a Tomcat in the backend on the front web server. Several bugs
(most in mod_disk_cache) prevented me from doing so in a straight forward
manner. So I wrote some patches that fixed these issues and
--On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:28 PM +0200 Rüdiger Plüm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
starting with Apache 2.0.50 I tried to use mod_cache / mod_disk_cache to
cache
responses from a Tomcat in the backend on the front web server. Several bugs
(most in mod_disk_cache) prevented me from doing so in
