On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Yes, that works for me! I tried the individual test and the whole test
suite dozens of times over and didn't get a single failure. I'm not sure
how it makes any difference, though, or exactly what it does. I
Nevertheless, unless someone objects in the next
day or so, I'd like to commit this change, as I
think leaving temp files lying around is a worse
problem.
No objection here :)
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Also, just to verify that it is the stray temp files
left over that are causing the problem, does it help
if you change the APR_EXCL flag in the call to apr_file_mktemp on
about line 832 of library/util.c
to
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Yes, that works for me! I tried the individual test and
the whole test suite dozens of times over and didn't get a
single failure. I'm not sure how it makes any difference,
though, or exactly what it does. I searched the whole of
my httpd-2.2.2 folder
Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's not
just running the test multiple times that causes the problem.)
I then
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's
not just running the test multiple
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Also, just to verify that it is the stray temp files
left over that are causing the problem, does it help
if you change the APR_EXCL flag in the
call to apr_file_mktemp on about line 832 of library/util.c
to APR_TRUNCATE?
Yep, that
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
nmake test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's not
just running the test multiple times that
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level nmake
test failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's not just running
the test multiple times that causes
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Which means
apr_pool_cleanup_register(pool, data,
apreq_file_cleanup, apreq_file_cleanup);
Contrary to the comment in library/util.c
data =
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[Thu Jul 20 23:45:45 2006] [error] [client 127.0.0.1]
(OS 80)The file exists. :
apreq_brigade_concat failed; TempDir problem?
which is coming from about line 288 of
module/apache2/filter.c. The file exists message
I think comes from the fact
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Which means
apr_pool_cleanup_register(pool, data,
apreq_file_cleanup, apreq_file_cleanup);
Contrary to the comment in library/util.c
data = apr_palloc(pool, sizeof *data);
/* cleanups
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
repeatedly from the glue/perl sub-directory and see whether or not it
ever fails for you. Did you get round to trying that?
Just did. 24 times. 100% success.
My usual combination of things.
Like Steve, I still see this
Quoting Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please download, test, and VOTE on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC4.tar.gz
The Fedora Extras package (development) will be available after signing.
--
Bojan
14 matches
Mail list logo
