On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/3/2011 6:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Not sure what you mean... we've added additional fields, always at the
end of the struct, during releases with just a minor MMN bump before.
To the scoreboard?
There are functions like ap_get_scoreboa
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:43 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I think 2.4.0 GA at AC is destined to be a "dot zero" release (most
emphasis on the zero, as in null). Not suggesting we don't do it,
simply that nobo
On 11/3/2011 6:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Not sure what you mean... we've added additional fields, always at the
> end of the struct, during releases with just a minor MMN bump before.
To the scoreboard?
On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:43 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> I think 2.4.0 GA at AC is destined to be a "dot zero" release (most
>> emphasis on the zero, as in null). Not suggesting we don't do it,
>> simply that nobody, including yourself, will be at li
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I think 2.4.0 GA at AC is destined to be a "dot zero" release (most
emphasis on the zero, as in null). Not suggesting we don't do it,
simply that nobody, including yourself, will be at liberty to change
scoreboard datum, api interfaces, etc.
Are w
On 28 Oct 2011, at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I believe apr-util v1.4 (containing apr_crypto) is also ready
That would be a subject for discussion on another list
Please don't quote half my sentence back at me, I said this:
"I believe apr-util v1.4 (containing apr_crypto) is also
On 10/28/2011 6:07 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 8:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffen wrote:
>>> Great,
>>> time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
>> It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an
>> attempted release.
>>
> For the p
On 10/28/2011 8:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffen wrote:
Great,
time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an
attempted release.
For the pre-mentioned AcceptFilter+windows+vhost thing I have been
runni
On 10/28/2011 7:51 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ?
It wouldn't matter.
The delta between 2.3.x-beta and 2.4.0 is not a code freeze...
it is API freeze, any public interfaces must be baked. We won't be
changing ap_doit() to add or change an argument until 2.6.0, wh
On 10/28/2011 7:59 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> I believe apr-util v1.4 (containing apr_crypto) is also ready
That would be a subject for discussion on another list
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Great,
> time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an
attempted release.
Great,
time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Eric Covener
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 4:38 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Steffen wrote:
Cannot find it in Trunk.
IIUC
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Cannot find it in Trunk.
IIUC This is the fix for ip-based vhosts with AcceptFilter none on
windows in trunk:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1181140
Cannot find it in Trunk.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Eric Covener
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:13 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Steffen wrote:
Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ?
A fix for
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ?
>
A fix for the AcceptFilter+windows+vhost thing was checked in a few weeks ago
On 28 Oct 2011, at 2:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I think we are ready...
I believe apr-util v1.4 (containing apr_crypto) is also ready, and so
is the mod_session_crypto module, which has been vastly simplified to
take advantage of the new API. As always, eyeballs appreciated.
Regards,
Gr
Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ?
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Jagielski"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev
On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
St
On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
>> an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
>>
>> There is a "hold up" due to an issue which may need to be
>> fixed/addressed and tha
On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
> an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
>
> There is a "hold up" due to an issue which may need to be
> fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay...
I'm happy to help by rolling 2.0
On Oct 27, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
>> an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
>>
>> There is a "hold up" due to an issue which may need to be
>> fixed/addressed an
On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
> an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
>
> There is a "hold up" due to an issue which may need to be
> fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay...
Thanks Jim, I was just c
Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
There is a "hold up" due to an issue which may need to be
fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay...
22 matches
Mail list logo
