Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:39 AM 3/22/2005, Graham Leggett wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. said: > >> It would be nice if before 2.2 we got around to changing the >> mod_ldap api to register optional functions. It will still fail >> to start if the user didn't load mod_ldap, but at least we would >> accept them loaded in

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-22 Thread Graham Leggett
William A. Rowe, Jr. said: > It would be nice if before 2.2 we got around to changing the > mod_ldap api to register optional functions. It will still fail > to start if the user didn't load mod_ldap, but at least we would > accept them loaded in either order. Is this easy to do? /me has yet to

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:44 AM 3/20/2005, Graham Leggett wrote: >Oden Eriksson wrote: > >>Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past? > >The order of modules is no longer important for configuration purposes (as I >understand), but it is important for practical reasons when one module depends >on

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-20 Thread Graham Leggett
Oden Eriksson wrote: Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past? The order of modules is no longer important for configuration purposes (as I understand), but it is important for practical reasons when one module depends on another module, for example in this case where mod_au

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:37:01PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts > between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is > currently addressing this. Would you be against re-rolling 2.1.4 with an updated apr-iconv that uses

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is currently addressing this. As far as alpha, my recent commit to pcre raises a concern that may or may not apply to httpd. The byteflip function did some quick extention and tr

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Oden Eriksson
torsdag 17 mars 2005 06.52 skrev Paul Querna: > Oden Eriksson wrote: > > onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: > >>Hi all, > >> > >>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: > >> > >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > >> > >>Please report back with any problems. > >>

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Paul Querna
Paul Querna wrote: Oden Eriksson wrote: onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander Hmm..., I get: Starting httpd21: httpd21:

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Paul Querna
Oden Eriksson wrote: onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander Hmm..., I get: Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on li

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Oden Eriksson
onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker: > Hi all, > > There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Please report back with any problems. > > Thanks for testing! > > > Sander Hmm..., I get: Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
+/- 0 for alpha based on apr-iconv 1.1.0 Revisiting issues for apr-iconv 1.1.1 - if that's our prerequisite, then I'm likely to lean +1. At 03:00 PM 3/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote: >Hi all, > >There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > >P

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Brad Nicholes
+1 NetWare Brad >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:00:47 PM >>> Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Graham Leggett
Sander Striker wrote: There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +1 (RHEL3 RPMs) Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:00 PM +0100 Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. +1 for beta on Darwin (modulo httpd-test issues from last t

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Sander Striker
Sander Striker wrote: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! FWIW: +1 Tested on: Linux (Ubuntu - Warty Warthog) Win32 (XP SP2)* Sander *) Source from the tag, no zip ball

Re: 2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Paul Querna
Sander Striker wrote: Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! +1, Fedora Core 3. -Paul

2.1.4 available for testing

2005-03-16 Thread Sander Striker
Hi all, There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report back with any problems. Thanks for testing! Sander