At 03:39 AM 3/22/2005, Graham Leggett wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
>
>> It would be nice if before 2.2 we got around to changing the
>> mod_ldap api to register optional functions. It will still fail
>> to start if the user didn't load mod_ldap, but at least we would
>> accept them loaded in
William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
> It would be nice if before 2.2 we got around to changing the
> mod_ldap api to register optional functions. It will still fail
> to start if the user didn't load mod_ldap, but at least we would
> accept them loaded in either order.
Is this easy to do?
/me has yet to
At 06:44 AM 3/20/2005, Graham Leggett wrote:
>Oden Eriksson wrote:
>
>>Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past?
>
>The order of modules is no longer important for configuration purposes (as I
>understand), but it is important for practical reasons when one module depends
>on
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past?
The order of modules is no longer important for configuration purposes
(as I understand), but it is important for practical reasons when one
module depends on another module, for example in this case where
mod_au
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:37:01PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts
> between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is
> currently addressing this.
Would you be against re-rolling 2.1.4 with an updated apr-iconv that uses
First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts
between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is
currently addressing this.
As far as alpha, my recent commit to pcre raises a concern that
may or may not apply to httpd. The byteflip function did some
quick extention and tr
torsdag 17 mars 2005 06.52 skrev Paul Querna:
> Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
> >>
> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >>
> >>Please report back with any problems.
> >>
Paul Querna wrote:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
Thanks for testing!
Sander
Hmm..., I get:
Starting httpd21: httpd21:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
Thanks for testing!
Sander
Hmm..., I get:
Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on li
onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please report back with any problems.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
>
> Sander
Hmm..., I get:
Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error
+/- 0 for alpha based on apr-iconv 1.1.0
Revisiting issues for apr-iconv 1.1.1 - if that's our prerequisite,
then I'm likely to lean +1.
At 03:00 PM 3/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>P
+1 NetWare
Brad
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:00:47 PM >>>
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
Thanks for testing!
Sander
Sander Striker wrote:
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1 (RHEL3 RPMs)
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:00 PM +0100 Sander Striker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
+1 for beta on Darwin (modulo httpd-test issues from last t
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
Thanks for testing!
FWIW: +1
Tested on:
Linux (Ubuntu - Warty Warthog)
Win32 (XP SP2)*
Sander
*) Source from the tag, no zip ball
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
Thanks for testing!
+1, Fedora Core 3.
-Paul
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
Thanks for testing!
Sander
17 matches
Mail list logo