On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm... iirc, if there is a mismatch, the old files are
>> automagically removed.
>
> You are right, I was still influenced by PR58024 triggering AH02599
> (painful fix), but that was
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Hmmm... iirc, if there is a mismatch, the old files are
> automagically removed.
You are right, I was still influenced by PR58024 triggering AH02599
(painful fix), but that was due to the missing unlink() semantic on
Windows...
I still thi
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport
>
>> ylavic: Looks like the changes on struct proxy_worker_shared would break
>> startup with "BalancerPersist on" due to the strict checks on
>> the sizes of existing slotmems (sl
re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport
> ylavic: Looks like the changes on struct proxy_worker_shared would break
> startup with "BalancerPersist on" due to the strict checks on
> the sizes of existing slotmems (slotmem_create/attach)?
> + jim: Yes, that is right (re:
