On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Kean Johnston wrote:
> Why don't you move the integer comparison to ahead of the apr_table_get and
> strcmp()? That way relatively expensive options get boolean short-circuited.
If we switch it to the default, then yah, that can help short-circuit
it. If it's not
On 12/30/2013 10:07 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Index: modules/http/http_filters.c
===
--- modules/http/http_filters.c (revision 1554304)
+++ modules/http/http_filters.c (workin
+1
On Dec 30, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Yeah, I'm leaning towards agreeing w/ you there.
>
> Both directives (HttpContentLengthHeadZero and HttpExpectStrict)
> committed in r1554303. See below for how it affects the w
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Yeah, I'm leaning towards agreeing w/ you there.
Both directives (HttpContentLengthHeadZero and HttpExpectStrict)
committed in r1554303. See below for how it affects the wire
protocol.
Now, let's discuss the defaults. =) I'm +1 to the be
Yeah, I'm leaning towards agreeing w/ you there.
On Dec 29, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> to trunk. We can discuss the defaults separately. But, the more I
> think about it, hiding C-L of 0 on HEAD seems like an incorrect
> out-of-the-box behavior. -- justin
>
Agreed. Thx for seeing those patches and proposing them
being added!
On Dec 29, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> This is why I am trying to fold the patches back in. There is a definite
> difference between open source and a real community. =) -- justin
>
> On Dec 29, 2013 10:1
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> As defaults, I'm -0, but as controllable alternatives: +1
I will whip up a patch for these two - will probably commit straight
to trunk. We can discuss the defaults separately. But, the more I
think about it, hiding C-L of 0 on HEAD seems
This is why I am trying to fold the patches back in. There is a definite
difference between open source and a real community. =) -- justin
On Dec 29, 2013 10:17 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> It is for reasons like this that I tend to dislike Github,
> simply because it creates this mentality...
As defaults, I'm -0, but as controllable alternatives: +1
On Dec 27, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> There are two patches that the Ceph community has applied to their httpd
> packages in combination with radosgw (S3 endpoint) - (see
> https://github.com/ceph/apache2)
It is for reasons like this that I tend to dislike Github,
simply because it creates this mentality...
What mentality you may say? The mentality to work separate
from the community. I am sure that there are useful things
in this repo, but instead of working w/ us, and making
us aware of them, they
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length on HEAD
> requests - IOW, they don't in
Please stop sending me these emails.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length
How can I unsubscribe from these emails?
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Len
On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of
> radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length on HEAD requests
> - IOW, they don't infer the lack of a Content-Length as being '0'. If we
> weren't
Hi all!
There are two patches that the Ceph community has applied to their httpd
packages in combination with radosgw (S3 endpoint) - (see
https://github.com/ceph/apache2).
One of them is to allow Content-Length of '0' to be emitted from HEAD
requests:
https://github.com/ceph/apache2/commit/0d99
15 matches
Mail list logo
