Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-21 Thread Igor Galić
- Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: OS2 ===conf default proposed StartServers 22 2 MinSpareThreads 55 5 MaxSpareThreads 10 10 20 MaxRequestsPerChild 01 0 Any comments?

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-21 Thread Brian Havard
On 21/06/10 09:20, Igor Galić wrote: - Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: OS2 ===conf default proposed StartServers 22 2 MinSpareThreads 55 5 MaxSpareThreads 10 10 20 MaxRequestsPerChild

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.06.2010 11:34, Brian Havard wrote: On 21/06/10 09:20, Igor Galić wrote: From docs/manual/upgrading.xml: +liPlatform support has been removed for BeOS, OS/2, TPF, and + even older platforms such as A/UX, Next, and Tandem. These were + believed to be broken anyway./li What

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-16 Thread Rainer Jung
On 16.06.2010 04:27, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 6/15/2010 7:27 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Am 16.06.2010 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Netware ===conf default proposed StartThreads250 50 50 MinSpareThreads 25 10 25

MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread Rainer Jung
The default configuration for various MPMs differs from the example configuration file conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf. Before bringing those two in sync, I want to propose the values we want to use as new defaults as well as for the extras configuration file. Prefork ===conf default

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients across all MPMs? On 6/15/2010 4:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: The default configuration for various MPMs differs from the example configuration file conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf. Before bringing those two in sync, I want to

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread Igor Galić
- William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients across all MPMs? Because it might come expensive Memory-wise with some MPMs. On 6/15/2010 4:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: The default configuration for various MPMs

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 15.06.2010 23:09, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients across all MPMs? I was uncertain about that. Users often tend to try to fix performance problems by adding concurrency to the web server. If your web server is configured

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/15/2010 4:20 PM, Igor Galić wrote: Worker/Event conf default proposed StartServers 23 2 MinSpareThreads 25 75 25 MaxSpareThreads 75 250100 MaxClients 150 400400 ThreadsPerChild

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/15/2010 4:42 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 15.06.2010 23:09, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients across all MPMs? I was uncertain about that. Users often tend to try to fix performance problems by adding concurrency to the web

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, Am 16.06.2010 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Netware ===conf default proposed StartThreads250 50 50 MinSpareThreads 25 10 25 MaxSpareThreads 250 100100 MaxThreads 1000 2048 1000

Re: MPM sizing defaults and config

2010-06-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/15/2010 7:27 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Am 16.06.2010 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Netware ===conf default proposed StartThreads250 50 50 MinSpareThreads 25 10 25 MaxSpareThreads 250 100100