On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 4/15/11 6:11 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 15.04.2011 23:01, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>>> FastCGI is a way to get us out of all sorts of dark alleys; let's be
>>> sure to keep it in mind as one of the tools to address binary
>>> co
On 4/15/11 6:11 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
> Am 15.04.2011 23:01, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>
>> FastCGI is a way to get us out of all sorts of dark alleys; let's be
>> sure to keep it in mind as one of the tools to address binary
>> compatibility issues, PHP-centered or not
>
> but you can not
Am 15.04.2011 23:01, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
> FastCGI is a way to get us out of all sorts of dark alleys; let's be
> sure to keep it in mind as one of the tools to address binary
> compatibility issues, PHP-centered or not
but you can not use .htaccess with cgi
what is the main reason using apac
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> PHP5.3.6 was just released, and the Windows binaries are built with VC9,
> meaning that it won't work with our Windows binaries. I know that it's been
> discussed before, and there's a plan to move to VC9,
On 3/18/2011 9:24 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the
> Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it
> *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users.
Quite honestly, this leaves me with a taste to sim
On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Win
On 03/18/2011 05:19 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
If I read this right, this is a similar issue to what we have in the
Python world with some Python extension modules on Windows.
One discussion thread about it can be found at:
http://psycopg.lighthou
On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the
> Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it
> *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users.
>
> PHP5.3.6 was just
On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
stable-ABI builds
+1
Do
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
>> binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
>> stable-ABI builds
>>
>
> +1
Doing that without suggesting
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
stable-ABI builds
+1
Regards
--
^TM
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't think we should ever point to third party httpd downloads.
>> Let those offering binaries compete in the same way as Ubuntu, Fedora,
>> etc.
>> I think in general that the Apac
On 03/18/2011 04:12 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
What would it take, from our side or from Stefan's, to make it ok for us to say "go
here for Windows binaries"? It surely seems that this would be a big win for both of
us.
AFAICT they do not pro
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> I don't think we should ever point to third party httpd downloads.
> Let those offering binaries compete in the same way as Ubuntu, Fedora,
> etc.
> I think in general that the Apache-on-Windows user community offers up
> a relatively small a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the
> Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it
> *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users.
>
> PHP5.3
Reply message -
From: "Rich Bowen"
Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2011 10:24
Subject: PHP5.3.6
To:
I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP
world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our
problem to me, and to many of
I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP
world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our
problem to me, and to many of our users.
PHP5.3.6 was just released, and the Windows binaries are built with VC9,
meaning tha
17 matches
Mail list logo
