Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-31 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Sander Temme wrote: On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the perl-fram

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-25 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:49:13 -0800, "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please apply the patch posted by Joe to ssl_engine_io.c. The problem should go away ! Yes, it does. Thanks! /L/e/k/t/u

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Sander Temme wrote: On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the perl-framework. All three bo

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-24 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
Please apply the patch posted by Joe to ssl_engine_io.c. The problem should go away ! -Madhu >-Original Message- >From: Juanma Barranquero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:51 AM >To: William A. Rowe, Jr.; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: 2.0.49 rol

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-24 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:37 -0600, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You built from scratch - can you give us a backtrace according to > VisualStudio or Dr Watson? Sure enough: allocator_free(apr_allocator_t * allocator=0xffec, apr_memnode_t * node=0x) Line 327 +

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-24 Thread Sander Temme
On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the perl-framework. All three boxes have IPv6 enabled.

Re: 2.0.49 rolled..piped logs

2004-03-19 Thread Bastiaan van der Put
Hi, piped log program '/usr/local/apache2/bin/logresolve >> /home/bassie/logs/access_log' failed unexpectedly Bug still thereusing this patch solves it again. --- server/log.c14 Jul 2003 14:48:40 - 1.135 +++ server/log.c1 Nov 2003 15:13:35 - @@ -743,6 +743,8 @@

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-19 Thread Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 08:16, Sander Temme wrote: > On the BSD box, when I switch the localhost lines so that IPv4 > (127.0.0.1) comes before IPv6 (::1), and re-run the tests, I see the > server (using netstat) bind to only IPv4. Tests succeed. This sounds like a --disable-v4-mapped issue. http:

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-19 Thread Sander Temme
On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the perl-framework. All three boxes have IPv6 enabled.

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-19 Thread Juanma Barranquero
[resent] On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:37 -0600, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You built from scratch - can you give us a backtrace according to > VisualStudio or Dr Watson? Sure enough: allocator_free(apr_allocator_t * allocator=0xffec, apr_memnode_t * node=0x) L

RE: 2.0.49 rolled - win32 binaries online

2004-03-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:42 PM 3/18/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources* >is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip > >Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow. are now up on http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binarie

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:16 PM 3/18/2004, Juanma Barranquero wrote: >On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:01:23 +0100, "Sascha Kersken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It builds and runs fine on Win2K using Visual Studio .NET 2002. > > > >I've built 2.0.49: > > - on Windows XP Professional (Spanish Edition) > - with Visual Studio

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:01:23 +0100, "Sascha Kersken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It builds and runs fine on Win2K using Visual Studio .NET 2002. I've built 2.0.49: - on Windows XP Professional (Spanish Edition) - with Visual Studio .NET 2003 - with OpenSSL 0.9.7d - with Zlib 1.1.4 It bui

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Sascha Kersken
> Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources* > is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip > > Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow. It builds and runs fine on Win2K using Visual Studio .NET 2002. Regards Sascha

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Allan Edwards
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources* is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip Win32 builders please test. +1 Windows 2003 Allan

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources* is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow. Bill At 06:39 AM 3/18/2004, Sander Striker wrote: >> > > I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: >> > > >> > >

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Bob MacMunn
ED]> Sent: Thu Mar 18 07:39:58 2004 Subject: RE: 2.0.49 rolled On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 13:16, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Str

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Sander Striker
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 13:16, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: > > > > > I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: > > > > > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/d

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM > Hi, > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: > > > I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: > > > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist > > It compiles and seems to work (SunOS 5.8 sparc). > > Just a m

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Andre Breiler
Hi, On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: > I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist It compiles and seems to work (SunOS 5.8 sparc). Just a minor side note that it still has #define AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL "49-dev" in. > And a big Thank You to all the tes

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
Sander Striker wrote: And a big Thank You to all the testers and developers for helping out. Thanks as always to you Sander for taking care of this!!!