-Original Message-
From: justin.erenkra...@gmail.com
Sent: Mittwoch, 25. August 2010 08:14
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: httpd trunk broken with Subversion: ap_log_rerror busted
In r951893, httpd modified a #define for APLOG_MARK to add in a
On 25.08.2010 10:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: justin.erenkra...@gmail.com
Yes, we could fix this by making mod_authz_svn conditional on the new
MMN, but - again, it's about even figuring out that the API is changed
and what to do about it. The root
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Mittwoch, 25. August 2010 11:15
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: httpd trunk broken with Subversion: ap_log_rerror busted
On 25.08.2010 10:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message
On 25.08.2010 11:19, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Maybe we should put a link to
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/developer/new_api_2_4.html in the
Module Developer Changes section in
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html
Done in r988987.
Rainer
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
In r951893, httpd modified a #define for APLOG_MARK to add in a new
parameter called APLOG_MODULE_INDEX (in addition to file and line
info).
This busts Subversion - specifically, mod_authz_svn which has a function called:
static void
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
Basicly all this stuff is done to use the advanced features of C99 compilers
that allow us to check with low effort whether a call to the error logging
function is needed at all given the currently
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
I agree that the comments/documentation should be improved. I will write a
how-to for adjusting modules to the new API.
Here is a constructive suggestion (*grin*): in APR, for some of the
more complex declarations (see
On 8/25/2010 9:56 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
This is the crux of my concern - should improve performance at the
very substantial cost of increasing complexity for understanding the
codebase (especially without comments).
That is nonsense; providing debug-level granularity of one module and
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
I agree that the comments/documentation should be improved. I will write a
how-to for adjusting modules to the new API.
Here is a
On 08/25/2010 07:57 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 8/25/2010 9:56 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
This is the crux of my concern - should improve performance at the
very substantial cost of increasing complexity for understanding the
codebase (especially without comments).
That is
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
I guess his comment was more about the macro wrappers and the C99 stuff,
which saves us the function call if we would not log due to the loglevel
currently set. I think this is one aspect of the changes and one were
we
On Wednesday 25 August 2010, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org
wrote:
I guess his comment was more about the macro wrappers and the C99
stuff, which saves us the function call if we would not log due
to the loglevel currently set. I
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
This is a good idea. I have started it in r989377.
Thanks! -- justin
13 matches
Mail list logo
