On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:08:28PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I would like to resurrect an old discussion. About a year and half
ago rbb and wrowe committed a patch for mod_ssl to provide the SSLEngine
upgrade capability. It seems that one of the reasons for not back
porting it to the
Brad I'm plus 1, especially if we can cause libwww to instigate this connection
mode for httpd-test and prove that it behaves per the RFC convention.
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the entire mod_ssl 2.1
back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues would need review. But too
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the entire mod_ssl 2.1
back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues would need review. But too many
good things have happened on 2.1 to this specific
I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the
2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I
would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the
2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I
would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the
entire mod_ssl 2.1
back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues
At 11:11 AM 3/5/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the
2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I
would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in.
-1 - too big a change too late in the cycle. +1 for
At 11:19 AM 3/5/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the
entire
