Does the event MPM work on Windows? Or is Apache on Windows still
limited to the winnt MPM? If so, doesn't this leave Apache on Windows
/far /behind other platforms when it comes to threads required for a
given load?
I guess it doesn't matter *that* much until the event MPM and mod_ssl
On 2/22/2012 9:21 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does the event MPM work on Windows? Or is Apache on Windows still limited to
the winnt
MPM? If so, doesn't this leave Apache on Windows /far /behind other
platforms when it
comes to threads required for a given load?
No / Yes / Compared to event -
However, it should be straightforward to apply event mpm logic to the
Windows MPM, more using completion contexts rather than poll. Any true
completion-oriented async winnt mpm should be expected to outperform
a poll based model, though YMMV.
IIRC there is a bugzilla patch for a complex
Ok, issues with all mod_ssl would be a big problem.
If you needed to do DisableWin32AcceptEx, though, then something was
already not quite right.
What you mean by mod_ssl on a port, though? You just mean running an
HTTPS listener right?
On 2/18/2012 12:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/20/2012 8:04 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Ok, issues with all mod_ssl would be a big problem.
If you needed to do DisableWin32AcceptEx, though, then something was already
not quite right.
What you mean by mod_ssl on a port, though? You just mean running an HTTPS
listener right?
Platform specific ... documentation.
Should I be thinking about writing something for AIX here, as I get it
finished. Or is the README file going to be sufficient?
I am working on it, just don't expect it yesterday :)
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 13:56, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
I haven't done much building on Windows. Does anyone have a good
link/suggestions to
begin producing httpd builds with openssl/openldap included?
I'll send you a quick how to.
Cheers
Mario
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well
as I am investigating howto build httpd with ldap support on AIX.
One path is with openldap, other is with with itdsclient (IBM Tivoli
Directory Server) support.
Other question, while asking - what is lua support? How
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 17:22, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well as
this is very specific to Windows build. But if you want to see it. See
the second post in this topic[1]
I am investigating howto build httpd
On 18 Feb 2012, at 6:22 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well as
I am investigating howto build httpd with ldap support on AIX.
One path is with openldap, other is with with itdsclient (IBM Tivoli
Directory Server) support.
You
Congrats folks, way to go!
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:42 AM
Subject: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
With the voting ending, I see the following results:
+1
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
Congratulations, very excited to soon have 2.4 in production!
Cheers
Tom
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
On 2/17/2012 9:13 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
On 2/17/2012 3:15 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
No, the Windows specific issue (PR 52476) has not been solved.
So it's GA for all but Windows.
On 2/17/2012 9:13 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17,
On 2/17/2012 10:38 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/17/2012 3:15 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
No, the Windows specific issue (PR 52476) has not been solved.
So it's GA for all but Windows.
It's quite
15 matches
Mail list logo
