On 2/14/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otherwise, I'd like to have some more detailled explanations (or a mail
> reference to) on this veto.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-mbox-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
HTH. -- justin
* William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-11 17:10:36]:
> >Why not simply ./automake and check in the resulting ./autoconf-ready
> >files? If you desire to delete the automake files afterwards, th
>
> ...at's fine. It's how we migrated the incubating mod_ftp out of automake.
> Of cou
* Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-12 01:50:38]:
> Expect for the automake problem, I already made the necessary changes
> to the surgery branch to comply with justin's will (aka not having an
> src/ directory and renaming data/ to docroot/).
s/Expect/Except/
Too late out there, nee
Hi,
* Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-10 01:22:22]:
> Before releasing mod_mbox, we need the work done in the surgery branch
> back to trunk. So, unless there is any objections to it, here it what
> I'll do in the next few days :
>
> - Move the scripts/ directory one level up, out
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Folks you are talking over each other.
Why not simply ./automake and check in the resulting ./autoconf-ready
files? If you desire to delete the automake files afterwards, th
...at's fine. It's how we migrated the incubating mod_ftp out of automake.
Of course more
Folks you are talking over each other.
Why not simply ./automake and check in the resulting ./autoconf-ready files?
If you desire to delete the automake files afterwards, th
Bill
Paul Querna wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/11/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you really wan
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/11/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you really want me to revert it I will. Then we won't have any build
system at all.
Maybe you are forgetting what we had before. A single makefile with
paths hard coded for your home directory.
build-dso was the '
On 2/11/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you really want me to revert it I will. Then we won't have any build
> system at all.
>
> Maybe you are forgetting what we had before. A single makefile with
> paths hard coded for your home directory.
build-dso was the 'build' system - not
* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-11 11:53:40]:
> automake doesn't work. The solution is to revert Paul's commit that
> introduces automake. (Paul should really be the one doing this - not
> you - since he started this mess and promised that he'd revert it way
> back when.)
>
> I
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/10/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okkaay. Please read again my paragraph. Now please read the STATUS
file. The current automake setup *works*, and migrating to the same
build system than httpd is planned. If you don't want any mod_mbox
release to go
On 2/10/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okkaay. Please read again my paragraph. Now please read the STATUS
> file. The current automake setup *works*, and migrating to the same
> build system than httpd is planned. If you don't want any mod_mbox
> release to go out until I find an
* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-10 21:54:27]:
> On 2/10/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It works, in a very simple and common way, and changing the build
> > system is not (yet) part of the showstoppers. Please keep in mind that
> > I want this release to be so
On 2/10/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It works, in a very simple and common way, and changing the build
> system is not (yet) part of the showstoppers. Please keep in mind that
> I want this release to be some kind of out-of-SoC release, not a
> mod-mbox-has-become-the-killer-mo
Hi,
* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-10 07:54:49]:
> Can you please consider removing automake? (I did -1 it when Paul
> committed automake the first time.)
If you feel brave enough to get a hand on the new build system, feel
free to do so. Personally, I don't know how it works,
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/9/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Recently, I've been working on cleaning up the directory structure of
the module's source code in a 'surgery' branch. Today, this work is
done and the branch's code compiles, installs and works fine here at
home. Ple
On 2/9/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently, I've been working on cleaning up the directory structure of
> the module's source code in a 'surgery' branch. Today, this work is
> done and the branch's code compiles, installs and works fine here at
> home. Please not that the fun
16 matches
Mail list logo
