On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 04:57, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:08 AM EDT, "Akins, Brian"
> wrote:
>
>> How many people actual run mod_lua (or a derivative/relative) in production?
>> Am I the only one on a "real" site?
>
> I guess the others, if any, aren't reading dev@. And searc
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:08 AM EDT, "Akins, Brian"
wrote:
> How many people actual run mod_lua (or a derivative/relative) in production?
> Am I the only one on a "real" site?
I guess the others, if any, aren't reading dev@. And searching gmane's
archive of the user list only turns up a few men
On 3/15/11 2:25 PM, "Dan Poirier" wrote:
> I agree too, but the discussion was about whether mod_lua might replace
> PHP some day, and I think if that's your goal (worthwhile or not) you'd
> have to provide web page embedding.
We never, ever run mod_php, only via fastcgi, anyway. No need to emb
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 11:47 AM EDT, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Akins, Brian wrote:
>> On 3/15/11 10:05 AM, "Dan Poirier" wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe if people could embed lua in web pages.
>>
>> FWIW, I don't think the web needs yet another web page generator embedded
>> ins
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 3/15/11 10:05 AM, "Dan Poirier" wrote:
>
>
>> Maybe if people could embed lua in web pages.
>
> FWIW, I don't think the web needs yet another web page generator embedded
> inside a web server. We apps should be ran by application servers
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 3/14/11 7:51 PM, "Brian McCallister" wrote:
>
>> I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module
>> to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level
>> functionality into a non-core module, which
On 3/15/11 10:05 AM, "Dan Poirier" wrote:
> Maybe if people could embed lua in web pages.
FWIW, I don't think the web needs yet another web page generator embedded
inside a web server. We apps should be ran by application servers -
fastcgi, proxy, etc.
But that's just my opinion ;)
--
Brian
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 08:05, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:36 AM EDT, HyperHacker wrote:
>
>> I've been eagerly looking forward to a stable mod_lua with which to
>> make my sites. If done well, Lua could replace PHP as the #1 web
>> scripting language
>
> Maybe if people could e
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:36 AM EDT, HyperHacker wrote:
> I've been eagerly looking forward to a stable mod_lua with which to
> make my sites. If done well, Lua could replace PHP as the #1 web
> scripting language
Maybe if people could embed lua in web pages.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:08, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 3/14/11 7:51 PM, "Brian McCallister" wrote:
>
>> I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module
>> to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level
>> functionality into a non-core module, which us
On Mon. 2011-03-14 at 07:51 PM EDT, Brian McCallister wrote:
> I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module
> to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level
> functionality into a non-core module, which uses the core mod_lua to
> hook into the serve
On 3/14/11 7:51 PM, "Brian McCallister" wrote:
> I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module
> to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level
> functionality into a non-core module, which uses the core mod_lua to
> hook into the server.
+1
How ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
