Great!
> Am 15.11.2016 um 10:09 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>>
>> The patch looks fine to me. I do just feel a tad bit uncomfortable with the
>> empty description. How about
>> +
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
> The patch looks fine to me. I do just feel a tad bit uncomfortable with the
> empty description. How about
> +return apr_psprintf(p, "%i No Description", status);
>
> There are probably tons of client
Yes, you can find bugzilla entries on this topic.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:09 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> >
> > What would a non-three-digit, >599 response look like? Perhaps we have
> > a
> Am 04.11.2016 um 17:23 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:09 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>> What would a non-three-digit, >599 response look like? Perhaps we have
>> a good case for a NULL response or a generic 500.
>
> AFAICT,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:09 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> What would a non-three-digit, >599 response look like? Perhaps we have
> a good case for a NULL response or a generic 500.
AFAICT, an empty reason is allowed (the space after the status is
required though).
So
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Stefan Eissing <
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> Like to get your opinion:
>
> ap_get_status_line(int) converts any status code it does not know into a
> 500. This is fine for the use cases we had so far, although it can be
> discussed if it is a good idea,