Yann Ylavic
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 21:34
>> An: httpd-dev
>> Betreff: Re: Time for 2.4.34?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Yann Ylavic
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Seems to
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 21:34
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: Time for 2.4.34?
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Seems to me that we are just about due for a 2.4.34 release...
>> Anyone opposed? I volunteer to RM.
>
> +1, thanks Jim.
Possibly someone for the last vote on r1588806?
This simple change
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Seems to me that we are just about due for a 2.4.34 release...
> Anyone opposed? I volunteer to RM.
+1, thanks Jim.
I can get their efforts committed late this evening, if nobody beats me to
it. Expect to need a bit of crlf tweaking.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 12:36 Marion et Christophe JAILLET <
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> +1, but latest zh-cn and zh-tw translation of error pages should be
> included IM
+1, but latest zh-cn and zh-tw translation of error pages should be
included IMHO.
I've pushed for including what was already in trunk, but Codeingboy and
popcorner have made improvements since the backport. (see docs@ ML)
Not sure to have time tonight to push it on trunk and propose for back
On 2018-07-05 10:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Seems to me that we are just about due for a 2.4.34 release...
Anyone opposed? I volunteer to RM.
+1
Do let me know if any of the scripts behave poorly for you. One thing
worth noting, if your local server isn't configured to send emails
through the
Le jeudi 05 juillet 2018 à 11:43 -0400, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
> Seems to me that we are just about due for a 2.4.34 release...
> Anyone opposed? I volunteer to RM.
+1, don't wait for my LFS patch. I'll submit for >2.4.34 (.35 or more).
Alain
+1
Thanks Jim!
> Am 05.07.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> Seems to me that we are just about due for a 2.4.34 release...
> Anyone opposed? I volunteer to RM.
On 05 Jul 2018, at 5:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Seems to me that we are just about due for a 2.4.34 release...
> Anyone opposed? I volunteer to RM.
+1, and thank you.
Regards,
Graham
—
Seems to me that we are just about due for a 2.4.34 release...
Anyone opposed? I volunteer to RM.
Yes, for sure :)
> On May 1, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Alain Toussaint wrote:
>
> I promised a patch for BLFS layout and haven't delivered yet. Will the
> release happen after
> Thursday? (I'll take Thursday to deliver the layout patch).
>
> Alain
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Considering that we have some regressions in .33 which
> will soon be fixed (these are the 2 noted ShowStoppers)
The fix for PR 62308 is being tested and we should be good soon, I think.
I don't think PR 62277 is a regression/showstopper, t
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:15:54PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Considering that we have some regressions in .33 which
> will soon be fixed (these are the 2 noted ShowStoppers)
> as well as a limited number of "other" changes to the
> codebase, maybe now is a Good Time to consider a 2.4.34...?
>
+1.
Some h2 issues accumulated, just got confirmation on the keepalive fix and will
propose for backport today. Nothing else in the pipe from me.
> Am 01.05.2018 um 23:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> Considering that we have some regressions in .33 which
> will soon be fixed (these are the 2 no
Le mardi 01 mai 2018 à 17:15 -0400, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
> Considering that we have some regressions in .33 which
> will soon be fixed (these are the 2 noted ShowStoppers)
> as well as a limited number of "other" changes to the
> codebase, maybe now is a Good Time to consider a 2.4.34...?
>
> I
On 01 May 2018, at 11:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Considering that we have some regressions in .33 which
> will soon be fixed (these are the 2 noted ShowStoppers)
> as well as a limited number of "other" changes to the
> codebase, maybe now is a Good Time to consider a 2.4.34...?
>
> I offer t
Considering that we have some regressions in .33 which
will soon be fixed (these are the 2 noted ShowStoppers)
as well as a limited number of "other" changes to the
codebase, maybe now is a Good Time to consider a 2.4.34...?
I offer to RM using Daniel's updated release scripts so
we can get a diff
18 matches
Mail list logo