Michael Clark wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:05:35 +0800
Michael Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, I'll report back on my experiments...
I look forward to it:-)
I have done some more investigation and have written up a proposal for
my intended approach to
Mladen Turk wrote:
Michael Clark wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:05:35 +0800
Michael Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, I'll report back on my experiments...
I look forward to it:-)
I have done some more investigation and have written up a proposal
for my
Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:05:35 +0800
Michael Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, I'll report back on my experiments...
I look forward to it:-)
I have done some more investigation and have written up a proposal for
my intended approach to this VFS requirement.
Michael Clark wrote:
Michael Clark wrote:
Attached is a proof of concept for an Apache VFS layer.
There are some encapsulation boundary issues also, apr_dbm_open comes
to mind. Not sure how to handle this (one reason why I want to have an
mod_dav_fs_props_xattr).
Anyway, I'll report back on
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:05:35 +0800
Michael Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Clark wrote:
Attached is a proof of concept for an Apache VFS layer.
Hope you don't mind me thinking aloud ( I know most of you are
having holidays now so I'm not expecting any detailed feedback
yet :) )
Nick Kew wrote:
In lieu of giving you that round tuit just now, can I just check
whether you're familiar with APVFS[1]? It looks as if you're
treading out similar ground here.
[1] http://apvfs.sourceforge.net or
http://sourceforge.net/projects/apvfs
Yes it does. Thanks very much for
Michael Clark wrote:
Attached is a proof of concept for an Apache VFS layer.
Hope you don't mind me thinking aloud ( I know most of you are
having holidays now so I'm not expecting any detailed feedback yet :) )
There were certain glaringly obvious flaws in what I had posted earlier
- it
Attached is a proof of concept for an Apache VFS layer.
There is a consumer API which just mimics the APR file IO API with
the addition of a request_rec *r argument (see example patch to
consumer code).
There is a provider interface using an ap_vfs_mount structure that
can be filled out and
