On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on that later on today.
>
> > On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> >
> > On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
> >
> >>
All done locally... waiting for SVN to come back up.
I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now
we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out
whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or _http2_module.
Currently, both trunk and 2.4.x are broken when building w/ h2
since it tries to include *both
Jim,
woot! Thx for backporting!
> Am 28.09.2015 um 15:27 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>:
>
> I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now
> we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out
> whether it's mod_h2 or http2,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:27:55AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I have folded the mod_h2-http/2 stuff into 2.4.x... Right now
> we are in that middle state where we were trying to figure out
> whether it's mod_h2 or http2, and hence _h2_module or _http2_module.
>
> Currently, bot
On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
> I wish you'd go with mod_http2 both to make it obvious what the module
> does (avoid confusion with H2 database) and because that's how other
> protocol modules like mod_http and mod_ftp are named.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
—
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm]
> Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 15:44
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: http/2 in 2.4.x
>
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum <m...@toftum.dk>
Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on that later on today.
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 3:38 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
>
>> I wish you'd go with mod_http2 both to make it obvious what the module
>> does (avoid