Agreed 100%
This whole episode stinks...
david
--On Saturday, November 23, 2002 3:32 PM -0800 Roy T. Fielding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we renamed the repository to httpd from httpd-2.0 (there is
a symlink for now), the CVSROOT/avail file doesn't match
the repository name, and
Agreed.
Didn't know we were in the business of screwing ourselves like this...
david
Since we renamed the repository to httpd from httpd-2.0 (there is
a symlink for now), the CVSROOT/avail file doesn't match
the repository name, and therefore I can't commit. Can we
fix that so I can
Since we renamed the repository to httpd from httpd-2.0 (there is
a symlink for now), the CVSROOT/avail file doesn't match
the repository name, and therefore I can't commit. Can we
fix that so I can commit to the new httpd repository directly?
Also, we need to get commit messages to show which
At 04:14 PM 11/23/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Since we renamed the repository to httpd from httpd-2.0 (there is
a symlink for now), the CVSROOT/avail file doesn't match
the repository name, and therefore I can't commit. Can we
fix that so I can commit to the new httpd repository directly?
Sounds
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 02:35 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
Also, we need to get commit messages to show which branch
the commit went against.
It does... by default (no branch) the commit is against cvs HEAD
(the development branch.) The commit message alerts you when
the commit
Since we renamed the repository to httpd from httpd-2.0 (there is
a symlink for now), the CVSROOT/avail file doesn't match
the repository name, and therefore I can't commit. Can we
fix that so I can commit to the new httpd repository directly?
Why the heck was that done? Too many things get
At 05:32 PM 11/23/2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Since we renamed the repository to httpd from httpd-2.0 (there is
a symlink for now), the CVSROOT/avail file doesn't match
the repository name, and therefore I can't commit. Can we
fix that so I can commit to the new httpd repository directly?
Why
