Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/24/2010 12:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:50 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. < > wr...@rowe-clan.net > > > wrote: > > > > On 9/24/2010 11:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > > > >

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On 9/24/2010 12:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:50 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: > > On 9/24/2010 11:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > > > I guess I'm also missing the bigger picture, but: > > > > - at first sight it sounds ve

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:50 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/24/2010 11:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > > > I guess I'm also missing the bigger picture, but: > > > > - at first sight it sounds very reasonable to provide the LD_LIBRARY_PATH > as well > > > > - it might result in problems, if t

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On 9/24/2010 11:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > I guess I'm also missing the bigger picture, but: > > - at first sight it sounds very reasonable to provide the LD_LIBRARY_PATH as > well > > - it might result in problems, if the binary to start uses system libs, which > exist in > LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On 24.09.2010 03:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 9/23/2010 6:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: These two are somewhat different in practice. When the path to the binary is omitted on the invocation/load, the shell/loader/whatever finds * executables only because of the PATH envvar Correct * s

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/23/2010 6:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > > These two are somewhat different in practice. > > > > When the path to the binary is omitted on the invocation/load, the > shell/loader/whatever finds > > > > * executables only because

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On 9/23/2010 6:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > These two are somewhat different in practice. > > When the path to the binary is omitted on the invocation/load, the > shell/loader/whatever finds > > * executables only because of the PATH envvar Correct > * shared libraries usually via the syste

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/23/2010 3:59 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. < > wr...@rowe-clan.net > > > wrote: > > > > On 9/23/2010 2:50 PM, wr...@apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On 9/23/2010 3:59 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: > > On 9/23/2010 2:50 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: wrowe > > Date: Thu Sep 23 19:50:14 2010 > > New Revision:

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/23/2010 2:50 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: wrowe > > Date: Thu Sep 23 19:50:14 2010 > > New Revision: 1000593 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1000593&view=rev > > Log: > > Because PATH and the library path a

Re: svn commit: r1000593 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/util_script.c

On 9/23/2010 2:50 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Thu Sep 23 19:50:14 2010 > New Revision: 1000593 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1000593&view=rev > Log: > Because PATH and the library path are closely interrelated, and the cause > of most confusion over cgi or fcgid