On 01/07/2011 08:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/7/2011 12:49 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
If caution is to be exercised for other reasons, such as losing data in the
event of a
crash, that's a separate issue, and should be handled separately.
It should be used with caution. Instead
On 07 Jan 2011, at 9:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
If caution is to be exercised for other reasons, such as losing
data in the event of a
crash, that's a separate issue, and should be handled separately.
It should be used with caution. Instead of arguing, replace the
caution.
Or I'm
On 1/8/2011 4:15 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
How about
noteThis directive should be used with caution as a crash might cause loss
of logging data./note
or something similar. Doc's wordsmithes please chime in :-).
Yup, that's the gist of it. Thanks for wordsmithing, and thanks Graham
for
On 1/8/2011 5:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
I've got a better idea. Why not collaborate with the other people in this
project instead
of attempting to bully them with the threat of yet-another-veto?
Before you try to mis-characterize me as a bully or as veto-happy, please
compare
the number
On 1/7/2011 12:37 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_log_config.xml (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_log_config.xml Fri Jan 7 18:37:25
2011
@@ -345,9 +345,6 @@
efficient disk access and hence higher performance. It may be
On 07 Jan 2011, at 8:44 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/7/2011 12:37 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_log_config.xml (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_log_config.xml Fri Jan 7
18:37:25 2011
@@ -345,9 +345,6 @@
efficient disk
On 1/7/2011 12:49 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
If caution is to be exercised for other reasons, such as losing data in the
event of a
crash, that's a separate issue, and should be handled separately.
It should be used with caution. Instead of arguing, replace the caution.
Or I'm happy to
