Thx!
On Dec 4, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.12.2011 15:38, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
@@ -551,7 +546,7 @@ static int scgi_handler(request_rec *r,
cleanup:
if (backend) {
backend-close = 1; /* always close the socket
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
@@ -551,7 +546,7 @@ static int scgi_handler(request_rec *r,
cleanup:
if (backend) {
backend-close = 1; /* always close the socket */
-ap_proxy_release_connection(PROXY_FUNCTION, backend, r-server);
+
On 04.12.2011 15:38, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
@@ -551,7 +546,7 @@ static int scgi_handler(request_rec *r,
cleanup:
if (backend) {
backend-close = 1; /* always close the socket */
-
While googling why one of my compilers would error out on this, it
revealed that the __FUNCTION__ macro is C99 and not ANSI nor C89, and
for now westillwant to support C89 AFAIK. I do not remember a
go-ahead
with C99 code. Did I miss that?
Unfortunately, you didn't miss it.
Cheers,
fuck off and delete my email from your list...I have tried many times..You
are bullshit !!
2011/12/2 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org
While googling why one of my compilers would error out on this, it
revealed that the __FUNCTION__ macro is C99 and not ANSI nor C89, and
for now
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_scgi.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_scgi.c?rev=1203859r1=1203858r2=1203859view=diff
==
---
