Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On 3/13/2017 7:31 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> On 2/20/2017 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Ruggeri >>> wrote: Hi, Bill; I've

Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > On 2/20/2017 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >>> Hi, Bill; >>>I've replied about the pre_connnection situation - hoping someone

Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:31 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> This is important for us on two fronts: >> * For mod_remoteip, we'd have to decide which to use. The current method >> is to prefer

Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On 2/20/2017 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, Bill; >>I've replied about the pre_connnection situation - hoping someone can >> give the proposed patch a test as I don't have a handy H2 testbed. > Yup!

Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, Bill; >I've replied about the pre_connnection situation - hoping someone can > give the proposed patch a test as I don't have a handy H2 testbed. Yup! Will review that thread - it's the -1 half (as opposed

Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On 2/16/2017 11:48 AM, wr...@apache.org wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Thu Feb 16 17:48:28 2017 > New Revision: 1783256 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1783256=rev > Log: > Slow two still-wobbly horses > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: