Re: Some patches to start supporting AS/400 (iSeries)

2001-11-19 Thread Gomez Henri
Ok, let clarify :) I'm commiter on tomcat project, works on mod_jk and allready sent many patches and contributions to Apache 2.0 (ie: apxs fix to build with multiples source files) The account [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a generic accound which let us (SLIB developpers) follow the [EMAIL PROTECTED],

obsolete stuff in apr

2001-11-19 Thread Pavel Novy
Hi, remove, please, the following obsolete stuff from the apr: apr/locks/NetWare/ apr/threadproc/NetWare/ It is causing confusion and problems when extracting apr tarballs on Win32 platform also (netware and NetWare is the same here). Thanks, Pavel

Apache 2.0.27 and 2.0.28 RPM available

2001-11-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Ok, now I'm subscribed I could announce, more easily, some works related to Apache 2.0. Apaceh 2.0.27 alpha and 2.0.28 beta are available at : http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/ To have them installable on a Linux boxes, together with good-old Apache 1.3.x, executable, config,

RE: Some patches to start supporting AS/400 (iSeries)

2001-11-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Ok, let clarify :) I'm commiter on tomcat project, works on mod_jk and allready sent many patches and contributions to Apache 2.0 (ie: apxs fix to build with multiples source files) The account [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a generic accound which let us (SLIB developpers) follow the [EMAIL

[PATCH] http-2.0/server/mpm/netware/mpm_netware.c

2001-11-19 Thread Pavel Novy
Hi, an optarg variable used here is conflicting with symbol name defined in the latest LIBC headers: ../../server/mpm/netware/mpm_netware.c: In function `netware_rewrite_args': ../../server/mpm/netware/mpm_netware.c:907: conflicting types for `___optarg' u:/ndk/libc/include/unistd.h:105:

Re: Some patches to start supporting AS/400 (iSeries)

2001-11-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
Gomez Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The account [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a generic accound which let the use of that account isn't a problem... we just wondered who sent the patch :) What do you think of the patches ? I know that IBM allready do the Apache 2.0 port from Apache 2.0beta18, and

RE: Some patches to start supporting AS/400 (iSeries)

2001-11-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
the use of that account isn't a problem... we just wondered who sent the patch :) ;) it's just me What do you think of the patches ? I know that IBM allready do the Apache 2.0 port from Apache 2.0beta18, and it works fine on AS/400, but since the IBM fellows port was not donated to ASF, to

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/metadata mod_unique_id.c

2001-11-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: trawick 01/11/19 05:48:58 Modified:.CHANGES STATUS modules/metadata mod_unique_id.c Log: APR-ize the resolver logic in mod_unique_id. This fixes a bug in logging the error from a failed DNS lookup. This is not to say that

[PATCH] Apache 2.0 and NetWare - compatibility issue (second try)

2001-11-19 Thread Pavel Novy
Hi, here are the corresponding patches to solve implementation/alignment issues with the bitfield used in a shared struct (apr_uri_t - request_rec). These problems are occuring if compiling Apache 2.0 for NetWare (Apache 1.3 also) with various compilers (gcc, Watcom, CodeWarrior). Changes are

Re: Off the mail list

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Read the Message Source or Full Headers of any email sent to you from this list. list-help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] list-post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send a blank email to the address as given. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

.htaccess Encryption in Java

2001-11-19 Thread kingofjava
Hi! We're trying to edit Apache's .htacces-file with a Java program. But unfortunately we aren't able to find a class which implements Apache's MD5 or crypt-algorithm. Does anyone know if there might be a solution for our problem? Thanks.

Re: obsolete stuff in apr

2001-11-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Apparently fixed [someone appears to have beaten me to it.] They've actually been gone for quite a long time. cvs co -P usually takes care of these sorts of issues. Yeah, that's probably it. --Cliff

Re: [PATCH] Apache Win32 restart (fix loosing keep-alive POST requests across a restart)

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Doesn't apply to head... are you debugging/testing against the current CVS? Or perhaps it was munged... could you repost as an attachment? - Original Message - From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 5:09 AM Subject: [PATCH] Apache

Re: [patch] AP_MODE_INIT

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Doug MacEachern [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:18 PM i mentioned a while back that i had hacked jim winstead's colobus NNTP server (designed to run under tcpserver or inetd) into a protocol handler using modperl-2.0. and that i had it working with mod_ssl.

Re: obsolete stuff in apr

2001-11-19 Thread Brad Nicholes
These subdirectories were removed or rename some time ago. You may need to resync your local repository. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, November 19, 2001 5:07:19 AM Hi, remove, please, the following obsolete stuff from the apr: apr/locks/NetWare/ apr/threadproc/NetWare/ It is causing confusion

Re: [PATCH] Apache Win32 restart (fix loosing keep-alive POST requests across a restart)

2001-11-19 Thread Bill Stoddard
Here it is... Doesn't apply to head... are you debugging/testing against the current CVS? Or perhaps it was munged... could you repost as an attachment? - Original Message - From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 5:09 AM

Re: Some patches to start supporting AS/400 (iSeries)

2001-11-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:10:58PM +0100, Gomez Henri wrote: Ok, I understand, but do you means I'll have to subscribe directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in order to propose some patches ? Nope, just put your name on the email so we know who the contributor is. :) It make sense to follow

Re: obsolete stuff in apr

2001-11-19 Thread Pavel Novy
I'm using the snapshots from http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/... Just downloaded the latest one (apr_2009111932.tar.gz) and it's still there :-(. What should I do to change this? Pavel Brad Nicholes wrote: These subdirectories were removed or rename some time ago. You may need to

[2.0] does not compile without threads

2001-11-19 Thread Martin Kraemer
Since three days, Apache-2.0 fails to compile unter FreeBSD: ssl_util.c:399: `APR_THREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function) It appears that APR_THREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT is used in several places without a check for APR_HAS_THREADS. That should not be the case, especially

Re: [2.0] does not compile without threads

2001-11-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
[forwarding to apr] Back in revision 1.2 of apr/include/apr_thread_mutex.h we added #if APR_HAS_THREADS blocks around all declarations in the header. This is what's cauing Martin's build failure. I'm not seeing this same pattern in the original apr_lock.h files. What is the right way to handle

Re: Apache 2.0.27 and 2.0.28 RPM available

2001-11-19 Thread Daniel Stone
Comparing with my Debian packages, the patches from which I will post after my exam: On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:40:55PM +0100, GOMEZ Henri wrote: BTW: From my RPM works I detect many stuff which could (should) be added : - Modify apachectl and apxs to use

Re: mod_auth_db

2001-11-19 Thread sterling
On 16 Nov 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote: But you lose the run-time selection of the db flavor that having both modules gives you... As I understand it, in order to lose function, apr-util needs to allow db type to be specified to apr_dbm_open(), mod_auth_dbm needs way to find what the type

Re: [2.0] does not compile without threads

2001-11-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:09:56PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Monday 19 November 2001 09:19 am, Aaron Bannert wrote: What is the right way to handle this? I don't think we should we be conditionally compiling declarations, only implementations. We can either go for runtime errors

RE: Reporting on Patches of FreeBSD ports (fwd)

2001-11-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I saw we have similar same problems. I'm working on Apache 2.0 RPM (on Redhat boxes) http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/ So I try to have it more 'FHS' compatible, and so it's a pain since many parts in conf/build process still assume that everything is under $prefix. Some others

Re: [2.0] does not compile without threads

2001-11-19 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Monday 19 November 2001 12:47 pm, Aaron Bannert wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:09:56PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Monday 19 November 2001 09:19 am, Aaron Bannert wrote: What is the right way to handle this? I don't think we should we be conditionally compiling declarations, only

(problem with awk generated export lists) Re: cvs commit:httpd-2.0/build make_nw_export.awk

2001-11-19 Thread Brad Nicholes
I ran into a problem where some of the hook functions were not being included in the AWK generated export list. This problem didn't show itself until MOD_PROXY tried to call ap_run_create_connection(). The problem is that some of the hook functions (and maybe others) are declared on multiple

Changing the SSI prefix in mod-include

2001-11-19 Thread Ian Holsman
Anybody got any issues with me making the start/end SSI tags customizable for mod-include? I'm hoping that this won't break the BNDM optimizations that people are putting in -- Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Measurement Analysis CNET Networks - (415) 344-2608

Re: Changing the SSI prefix in mod-include

2001-11-19 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Monday 19 November 2001 04:10 pm, Ian Holsman wrote: Anybody got any issues with me making the start/end SSI tags customizable for mod-include? I'm hoping that this won't break the BNDM optimizations that people are putting in Why would you want to do that? The start/end tags are well

Re: distro subdirs of build

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:44 PM Would anyone mind if I created subdirectories under build for the various third-party distribution stuff that they would like to contribute but isn't generic enough yet for the normal tree? Alternatively, how

Re: Changing the SSI prefix in mod-include

2001-11-19 Thread Brian Pane
Ryan Bloom wrote: On Monday 19 November 2001 04:10 pm, Ian Holsman wrote: Anybody got any issues with me making the start/end SSI tags customizable for mod-include? I'm hoping that this won't break the BNDM optimizations that people are putting in No problem...the bndm code doesn't have any

Win95 fails the Apache 2.0 beta

2001-11-19 Thread jlwpc1
FYI Windows 95 B (FAT32) D:\ap20\Apache2\binstart apache -k start A device attached to the system is not functioning. An error dialog pops up: Error Starting Program The LIBAPR.DLL file is linked to missing export KERNEL32.DLL:GetFileAttributesExA Seems GetFileAttributesExA OSes are:

Re: distro subdirs of build

2001-11-19 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 06:12:05PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: From: Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:44 PM Would anyone mind if I created subdirectories under build for the various third-party distribution stuff that they would like to

Re: Win95 fails the Apache 2.0 beta

2001-11-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, jlwpc1 wrote: Windows 95 B (FAT32) Guess no one on this list has a Windows 95 close by - I don't know why not! :) I believe we've said we're not going to support Win9x/ME at WinNT/2K/XP's expense, right? We've been saying for quite some to expect that Win9x/ME would

New httpd.apache.org website...

2001-11-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
http://httpd.ucf.ics.uci.edu/ Last call. This is anakia-based, XML-based, blah, blah, blah. Rough cuts for the replacement of the dev.apache.org site as well. I plan on going live with this on Wednesday morning (replacing the content in httpd-site with this and then doing a fresh checkout of

Re: Win95 fails the Apache 2.0 beta

2001-11-19 Thread Bill Stoddard
The code is in mpm_winnt.c to work on 9*/ME. Just needs to be debugged. Shouldn't require a whole lot of work but I am not doing it :-) Bill On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, jlwpc1 wrote: Windows 95 B (FAT32) Guess no one on this list has a Windows 95 close by - I don't know why not! :) I

Re: Proxy Filters

2001-11-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 02:25:57PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: Just came across something weird. I can't get a filter to run on top of a proxied file... I think it is just me being stupid.. but the following doesn't seem to parse the SSI commands coming through ;( Locaton /foo

Re: Win95 fails the Apache 2.0 beta

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:57 PM I believe we've said we're not going to support Win9x/ME at WinNT/2K/XP's expense, right? Well, we simply didn't actively develop on 9x. Most of us have other priorities, like optimizing around an OS with a

Remove input filtering as a showstopper?

2001-11-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
Would anyone complain if I downgrade the revamp the input filter semantics entry in STATUS from a showstopper to a nice to wrap this up? I'd say about 90% of it is done - the only thing left is determining what the heck to do with ap_getline(). I'm of the idea that there is no clean solution

Re: Reporting on Patches of FreeBSD ports (fwd)

2001-11-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:58:49PM +0100, GOMEZ Henri wrote: - It could be fine also to add --with-ssl-port I'd rather see them set the SSL port manually, but that's me. Other people? - config_vars.mk is installed under $prefix/build whereas I'd like to put it on /usr/lib/apache2

Re: Remove input filtering as a showstopper?

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:38 PM Would anyone complain if I downgrade the revamp the input filter semantics entry in STATUS from a showstopper to a nice to wrap this up? I'd say about 90% of it is done - the only thing left is No... it's

Re: Remove input filtering as a showstopper?

2001-11-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:57:50PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: If you mixed up ap_getline into the input filtering semantics, you were very confused, please split those issues again. Yeah, your update to the STATUS file seems like the right division here. Apologize for the confusion,

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe 01/11/19 19:49:50 Modified:.STATUS Log: Split Justin's and my key issues, which have become tangled (yet have nothing to do with one another.) Revision ChangesPath 1.341 +8 -2 httpd-2.0/STATUS Index: STATUS

Re: Better privacy with SERVER_SIGNATURE

2001-11-19 Thread Ian Holsman
On 11/19/01 9:39 PM, Thomas Eibner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 06:35:27AM +0200, Thomas Eibner wrote: I don't like the idea of people being able to change the server signature to something like AnythingGoes/1.0, 'cause there is really no product called that, if it's

Re: Reporting on Patches of FreeBSD ports (fwd)

2001-11-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:49:35PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:58:49PM +0100, GOMEZ Henri wrote: - It could be fine also to add --with-ssl-port I'd rather see them set the SSL port manually, but that's me. Other people? Yes, and I'm -0.9 on both

Re: New httpd.apache.org website...

2001-11-19 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Looks good. Keep up the good work. Dw

[PATCH 3] speedup for apr_table_t

2001-11-19 Thread Brian Pane
Here's the latest revision of my apr_table_t optimizations. It's the same as the last one, except that the hash table in apr_table_overlap() now uses a red-black tree rather than a linear list to hold multiple entries per hash bucket, so that the worst-case run time of apr_table_overlap() is

FilesystemOption flags???

2001-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Dietz, Phil E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 2:44 PM OK, I converted my ETag patch to use Options. Of note: - the allow_options_t size increased to a long because all 8 bits of char were in use. - if InodeEtag is not present in Options, it uses inodes like the