Hello, folks;
Jeff had kindly committed a STATUS update for a 2.2 patch for bug
48939 about a month ago for me. I just noticed that William commented
while I was out of town that lest Jeff votes (or presumably others vote)
he will remove the item from STATUS. I was hoping to draw the
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those
requests targeted by session to that server. Once the number of sessions
settles on
On 6/29/2010 9:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled
choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing,
where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those
requests targeted by session to
