Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

> On Mar 3, 2018, at 4:51 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> "ab" no longer can benchmark https urls, same build-spec and environment >> (Fedora 26 and 27) > > Hmm, looks like 2.4 is

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > that pacthfile is unuseable for rpmbuild > > + echo 'Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch):' > Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch): > + /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0 > can't

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

Am 04.03.2018 um 20:33 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: that patchfile is unuseable for rpmbuild + echo 'Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch):' Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch): + /usr/bin/patch

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:38 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > Am 04.03.2018 um 20:33 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >>> >>> >>> that patchfile is unuseable for rpmbuild >>> >>> + echo 'Patch #4

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.31: [X] +1: It’s not just good, it’s good enough! Works for me on Debian(s) 9, 8 and 7. No opinion on whether "ab"

Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> "ab" no longer can benchmark https urls, same build-spec and environment >> (Fedora 26 and 27) > > Hmm, looks like 2.4 is missing

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

Am 04.03.2018 um 20:24 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: -1 "ab" no longer can benchmark https urls, same build-spec and environment (Fedora 26 and 27)

[RESULT] Release httpd-2.4.31

As RM, I am not comfortable releasing this with the bug discovered in ab. As such, I'm calling this one dead-on-the-vine and version 2.4.31 will not be released. -- Daniel Ruggeri From: Daniel Ruggeri [mailto:drugg...@primary.net] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2018 9:57 AM To:

RE: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

I've tested the patch against 2.4.31 as provided in STATUS and confirmed it fixes the issue. Thanks for the very fast turnaround. I'd like to ask a followup question... how do we catch this in the test suite? With this (100% failure), ab still returns a 0 exit code. It *does* at least give the

Re: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > I'd like to ask a followup question... how do we catch this in the > test suite? With this (100% failure), ab still returns a 0 exit code. > It *does* at least give the error message to STDERR. Perhaps we > should

RE: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

> -Original Message- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 5:09 PM > To: httpd-dev > Subject: Re: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31) > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1825777 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/style/version.ent include/ap_release.h

On 03/03/2018 04:53 PM, drugg...@apache.org wrote: > Author: druggeri > Date: Sat Mar 3 15:53:13 2018 > New Revision: 1825777 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1825777=rev > Log: > Post 2.4.31 tag updates > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES >