> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Christophe Jaillet
> Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juni 2018 14:08
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1682074 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./
> STATUS modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c
>
> Le 27/05/2015 à 18:33, wr...@apache.org a écrit
I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go through the
votes. Just let me know what you prefer.
> Am 29.06.2018 um 21:31 schrieb Christophe Jaillet
> :
>
>> Le 29/06/2018 à 13:53, ic...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Author: icing
>> Date: Fri Jun 29 11:53:50 2018
>> New
Le 02/07/2018 à 22:51, drugg...@apache.org a écrit :
+ druggeri: Why no +1, jallietc36?
+
I vote when I can test or when trivial enough.
But it does not prevent me from proposing what looks interesting, so
that the other ones, with more technical background or experience than
me, have a
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> So, just proposing, is my only contribution in such a case.
>> Hoping it helps.
>
> pointing out these lost revisions is very helpful!
+1
> So, just proposing, is my only contribution in such a case.
> Hoping it helps.
pointing out these lost revisions is very helpful!
Le 02/07/2018 à 17:36, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing
mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>> wrote:
I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer.
I basically
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> I thought experimental == CTR, but if this is separate then I‘ll go
> through the votes. Just let me know what you prefer.
I basically thought the same thing, but it is clearly spelled out in STATUS.
We aught to adjust this to reflect the
