On 3/8/22 12:57 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 02:01:42PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > I got a new "may be uninitialized" warning with with the GCC 12 shapshot
> > used in Fedora 36 (which is still under development and can be
> > unreliable). I think it's unreachable, if we enter here:
> >
> >
For anyone thinking about testing rc1, there is a high chance of an rc2 coming
soon.
Will announce here,
Stefan
> Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung :
>
>
> Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
>> Hi all,
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
On 3/8/22 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
>>
>> Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>
>>> I would like
> Am 08.03.2022 um 14:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build.
>>
>> Vastly simpler.
>>
>
> I agree w/ that...
I have the feeling that the work that has went into making
On 08 Mar 2022, at 10:29, Joe Orton wrote:
>> “No need to patch/compile locally" is not a good idea - currently the
>> travis tests target Ubuntu only, and this is a practical limitation
>> forced upon us by the nature of the Travis service. I want to see
>> reviewers try out the patch on
Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc1
> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
>
> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build.
>
> Vastly simpler.
>
I agree w/ that...
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as 2.4.53:
[ ] +1: It's
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball
Am 08.03.2022 um 17:06 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
On 3/8/22 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> I have the feeling that the work that has went into making our
> tests run on travis is not sufficiently honoured in this discussion.
>
> Looking back on the last 6 years I participated here, the situation
> now is *vastly* improved to what we had before. For me, the Travis CI
> status is now
Am 08.03.2022 um 18:22 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 08.03.2022 um 17:06 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
On 3/8/22 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and
On 3/8/22 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
>
> You gcc 4.8 workaround for _Thread_local still looks good.
>
> Solaris builds and all unit tests not yet done but compiles fine for all my
> Linuxes.
>
> Thanks!
Thanks for testing. I committed to trunk as r1898771 to throw it into our CI.
If
On 3/8/22 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
>>
>> Two additional things I already saw, but which are non.critical:
>>
>> - configure flag --with-pcre no longer accepts an external pcre 8
>> installation directory. It seems in that case the flag must
>> now point to the path of the pcre-config
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 01:46:51PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Joe,
>
> I'll change the release candidate tag/branch names and if that works,
> you can strip some regex from the travis setup.
Looks good to me, thanks Stefan. I've updated the regexes.
Regards, Joe
On 3/7/22 12:23 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> AIUI you can configure github to allow merges even if tests fail, though
> I'm not familiar with that, has anybody played with the settings there?
>
Haven't played with them, but the below looks like a good starting point:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:40:49AM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > On Mar 4, 2022, at 6:17 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:05 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> A question: Would it be easier for all this if we moved to being Github
> >> canon?
> >
> > I think it is
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 01:28:19PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 07 Mar 2022, at 11:21, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> > I'd really like, as a reviewer of backports, you can:
> > - see that it passes all our tests. No need to patch/compile/test locally.
>
> “No need to patch/compile locally" is
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:24:37AM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> > Am 04.03.2022 um 08:32 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
> > On 3/3/22 5:40 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> >> Oh, good question. I'm not sure how the "branch" variable appears in an
> >> arbitrary branch but it's possible we'd need to tweak the
On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I am however strongly opposed for Github to be our only promotion process.
>
> CI is great right until the point you get your first unrelated test failure,
> then it is a nightmare. The collectd project was completely stuck unable
22 matches
Mail list logo
