Okey, I'm a real neophyte when it comes to SSL.
I need to [pretty much] duplicate the SSL tests for
IBM's SSL module. Among other things, I presume that
means I need to create some things (keys? certs?)
corresponding to those in the t/ssl/{keys,certs} directories.
Right? Or are the
i just added a t/conf/ssl/README with descriptions.
i would hope that the ibm ssl module can understand the same certificates
and keys, as they are standard formats. the same if verisign or other
well known ca were to issue them. what does ibm use for a crypto library?
rsa? openssl? or does
I can't run Virtual Host in Apache Webserver in Linux
RedHat 7.0
The site I creat in httpd.conf when I want to display
on browser only index to a DocumentRoot of the first
site.
ServerRoot /usr/local/apache
ServerName www.linux_vn.com
DocumentRoot /docs/htdocs
# Use name-based virtual
From: Tung Nguyen Thanh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I can't run Virtual Host in Apache Webserver in Linux
RedHat 7.0
The site I creat in httpd.conf when I want to display
on browser only index to a DocumentRoot of the first
site.
ServerRoot /usr/local/apache
ServerName
More info:
I just installed the official 2.0.28 msi installer, and (of course) put it
into a different directory from the one into which I installed the 2.0.28
binary I built myself. The httpd.conf configuration is identical except for
Listen (7171 vs. 7070), the server name, and the directory
Did you build with SSL support? Does the MSI file contain SSL support?
I've also experienced your problem and would like to track it down.
Dave Seidel wrote:
More info:
I just installed the official 2.0.28 msi installer, and (of course) put it
into a different directory from the one into
No SSL in either.
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
Did you build with SSL support? Does the MSI file contain SSL
- Original Message -
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: make certificate Doesn't Work, Apache 2.0.28, Unix, and mod_ssl (fwd)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:50:39AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:50:39AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Acked. Did we decide what we're going to do about this? Or is it just
waiting on somebody to do it?
I think wrowe and I were of the mind that we shouldn't have any
dummy
From: Dave Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:10 AM
FYI, I did my local build using VC 6.0, using the InstallBin target in the
IDE, using all the project files as they came from the zip archive.
Dave, if you grab a recent PlatformSDK from Microsoft's site, and
IMHO, it'd be nice to have the certificate creation utility.. It'd certainly
help the user in a non-trivial manner - atleast to understand the process of
creating a certificate..
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:18:13PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Okay, sorry, I was confused. I didn't realize make certificate was the
Snake Oil thing... I thought it was the script to generate a private key
and a real CSR.
I'm not exactly sure what make certificate is in this context. =)
Hello there,
I am trying to understand the VirtualHost directives for Apache 2.0,
specifically with regards to specifying the port. With ServerName directive
now able to specify ports, it brings another element into the picture. Does
it make a difference if the port is specified in the
Hi.
The big thing about ServerName in 2.0 is that it has taken over for the Port
directive from 1.3. So, the following config means that the server
listens on 127.0.0.1, port 8080, but reports itself as foo.com on port 80.
VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080
ServerName foo.com:80
/VirtualHost
That
All of the changes I'd like to introduce below impact one another, and
are based on several basic premises;
1. A sub_req_lookup() caller (of any flavor) should be able to make
heads or tails of the request based on the processing that occurs
within ap_process_request_internal().
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
3. Namespace polution is evil. Ergo, any module should reject requests
for a document with path_info if it doesn't address the name space
passed in path_info for the request.
Can you explain this in different words? And/or maybe an example?
--
#ken
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:07 PM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
3. Namespace polution is evil. Ergo, any module should reject requests
for a document with path_info if it doesn't address the name space
passed in path_info
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But if you never use path_info, it should be rejected to
prevent exactly this sort of polution/infinite recursion.
Ah, so you're suggesting that anything that actually maps
a URI to a document, but which doesn't do anything with
path-info, should return 404 if the
OK, I installed the August 2001 Platform SDK from the November MSDN issue
(if there's a later one, they haven't sent it, and the website is down).
Made sure to install the Visual Studio integration, etc. Wiped out
httpd-2_0_28, unzipped a fresh copy, rebuilt. Same problem.
Then I reinstalled
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:34 PM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But if you never use path_info, it should be rejected to
prevent exactly this sort of polution/infinite recursion.
Ah, so you're suggesting that anything that
Anybody know why the bug database just started resending a slew of
messages that are random ages, some dating back several months?
Just curious.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Anybody know why the bug database just started resending a slew of
messages that are random ages, some dating back several months?
Nevermind. Thanks, Marc.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Anybody know why the bug database just started resending a slew of
messages that are random ages, some dating back several months?
Just curious.
Yes.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:46:38 -0800 (PST)
From:
HI,
Some time ago the post_config phase return types was changed from
void to int in order detect if a module could not be configured
correctly at this phase.
I was wondering if there is a reason why this was not done for
the register-hooks phase and the pre-config phase??
harrie
On Wednesday 12 December 2001 02:14 pm, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
HI,
Some time ago the post_config phase return types was changed from
void to int in order detect if a module could not be configured
correctly at this phase.
I was wondering if there is a reason why this was not done for
--On Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:21 PM -0800 Ryan Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2001 02:14 pm, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
HI,
Some time ago the post_config phase return types was changed from
void to int in order detect if a module could not be configured
Dwayne Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm confused on how to use the AddHandler directive.
I've written a module, loaded it, and it seems to get called for every
page requested. Do I need to determine if the page is something I
want to handle or pass on? I thought the AddHandler
On Wednesday 12 December 2001 02:25 pm, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
--On Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:21 PM -0800 Ryan Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2001 02:14 pm, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
HI,
Some time ago the post_config phase return types was changed from
This is a change that was implemented in mod_dav version 1.0.3.
It hasn't been ported to the version of mod_dav included
with httpd V 2.0.X. (i.e. modules/dav).
This change enables Windows clients using WebFolders to
display the value of the creationdate and getlastmodified
properties.
This
--On Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:32 PM -0800 Ryan Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or for instance, the register_hooks fails where some
memory needed to be allocated. This function after all
gets an apr_pool_t...
But we never try to recover from an out of memory error, because it can't
Should we issue a warning if this happens and push StartServers back
down to the MaxSpareServers (or a function of MaxSpareThreads) limit?
Would an admin ever really want to do that?
-aaron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
aaron 01/12/12 15:56:46
Modified:server mpm_common.c
.CHANGES
Log:
Fix a bug in how we select the IP for the POD to connect to for dummy
connects (dislodging a doomed child from the accept mutex). No longer
do we
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:04:11PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
aaron 01/12/12 15:56:46
Modified:server mpm_common.c
.CHANGES
Log:
Fix a bug in how we select the IP for the POD to connect to for dummy
connects
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:04:11PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
aaron 01/12/12 15:56:46
Modified:server mpm_common.c
.CHANGES
Log:
Fix a bug in how we select the IP
wrowe 01/12/12 16:43:14
Modified:server core.c
Log:
Whatever this was doing, it looks most unholy.
Revision ChangesPath
1.114 +10 -6 httpd-2.0/server/core.c
Index: core.c
===
Is this what we meant here?
Index: modules/mappers/mod_negotiation.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/mappers/mod_negotiation.c,v
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -u -r1.84 mod_negotiation.c
---
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/11/10 20:30:54 $]
Release:
1.3.22: Tagged Oct 8, 2001. Announced Oct 12, 2001.
1.3.21: Not released.
(Pulled for htdocs/manual config mismatch. t/r Oct 5, 2001)
37 matches
Mail list logo
