In apr_sockaddr_info_get(), I see this:
error = getaddrinfo(hostname, numptr, hints, ai_list);
if (error) {
if (error == EAI_SYSTEM) {
return errno;
}
else {
/* issues with representing this with APR's error
Subject: apidoc/ - API-dict.html (apache-devsite)
Since Brian forwarded my question to dev@httpd list on which I'm lurking, let me
resolve my own question:
Do you have any idea where the contents of directory /apidoc/ (apache-devsite) are?
They are in httpd-docs-1.3/apidoc/. So looks like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:module-1.0 proxy_ftp.c
Log:
ftp proxy: various cosmetic and functional improvements
(also integrated into apache-1.3.24-dev):
With the combining of module-1.0 into the main v1.3 tree, is there any
point in keeping module-1.0 around...?
Also -
dev@apr is the right list :)
Martin Kraemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In apr_sockaddr_info_get(), I see this:
error = getaddrinfo(hostname, numptr, hints, ai_list);
if (error) {
if (error == EAI_SYSTEM) {
return errno;
}
In my
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:44:38PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
I'll leave it alone for an hour or two and then restart it unless
someone volunteers to investigate this.
I just bounced us back to 2_0_28. Thanks for pointing this out, Manoj.
What we were we on?
From: Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:54 AM
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:44:38PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
I'll leave it alone for an hour or two and then restart it unless
someone volunteers to investigate this.
I just
I asked this question yesterday but I didn't get a reply. I don't
know if you are still working on this problem or if this is a different
issue, but as it stands, mod_negotiation doesn't do anything.The
reason is because a check for dirent.filetype != APR_REG was added but
APR_FINFO_TYPE
I didn't get any feedback the first time I posted this.
Thanks.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [PATCH] log cookie values in 1.3
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:41:47 -0500
From: Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I copied the %C{CookieName} log variable from
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:22:45AM -0500, Brian Akins wrote:
I didn't get any feedback the first time I posted this.
Looks good to me (not tested), I was just wonder if 2.0 supports logging
of Cookie2 fields also? Anything planned on that?
Thanks.
-- Forwarded Message --
Hi all,
On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
behaviour, and the question has come up what about HTTP/0.9?. Am I
correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
the protocol is v0.9 or v1.0, and there is no host header, and there is
no complete
Graham Leggett wrote:
On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
behaviour, and the question has come up what about HTTP/0.9?. Am I
correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
the protocol is v0.9 or v1.0, and there is no host header, and
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:35:58AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
behaviour, and the question has come up what about HTTP/0.9?. Am I
correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
the protocol is v0.9 or
On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
behaviour, and the question has come up what about HTTP/0.9?. Am I
correct in saying it is not possible to find the destination server if
the protocol is v0.9 or v1.0, and there is no host header, and there is
no complete URL
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:29:56PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to up the system limit for fd's on FreeBSD
without recompiling the kernel?
sysctl -w kern.maxfiles=your new value
kern.openfiles says only 888 right now, so I'm sort of doubtful this
is coming from
I think I forwarded a message about this..
I just tried to fetch the 1.3.22 tarball, and here's what
I got:
$ wget -c http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/apache_1.3.22.tar.gz
--20:37:54-- http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/apache_1.3.22.tar.gz
= `apache_1.3.22.tar.gz'
Connecting to
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
1. Why is a request for 1.3.22 being redirected to 1.3.23?
No idea.
2. Why aren't the 1.3.22 tarballs available somewhere in the
dist tree? Jim?
Should they be? If any place, they should be in a subdir, and not
in the main dist level, IMO.
--
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:56:09PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
1. Why is a request for 1.3.22 being redirected to 1.3.23?
No idea.
mod_speling?
jim
httpd, htpasswd, htdigest, and the other main applications need
to be built with static libraries. In other words, they must
not be linked against libapr.so and friends.
Why? Because otherwise we make life difficult for users, and
make violation of the Principle of Least Astonishment a virtual
I suspect something is messed up in your build. f-ctx (and net-c) are both
initialized
in the core_install_transport_filters(conn_rec *c, apr_socket_t *csd) call. It compiles
and serves pages cleanly for me. Can you verify if core_install_transport_filters is
being
run?
Bill
[EMAIL
So as Graham said proxy should reply 501 or 505 right?
Chuck
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 05:47 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On the proxy list there is talk of support for transparent-proxy
behaviour, and the question has come up what about HTTP/0.9?. Am I
correct in saying it is not
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 06:04 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:module-1.0 proxy_ftp.c
Log:
ftp proxy: various cosmetic and functional improvements
(also integrated into apache-1.3.24-dev):
With the combining of module-1.0 into the main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jerenkrantz02/01/29 18:06:09
Modified:server protocol.c
Log:
Simplify the exit paths of ap_rgetline by creating a second brigade for
use when we do AP_MODE_SPECULATIVE. This allows us to delete the
brigades earlier.
(In practice, it
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suspect something is messed up in your build.
never :) (seriously... I spend most of my day watching make
extraclean scroll by... even after a config file change)
All I gotta say is:
#0 core_output_filter (f=0x40615fec, b=0x405ddff4) at
Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
httpd, htpasswd, htdigest, and the other main applications need
to be built with static libraries. In other words, they must
not be linked against libapr.so and friends.
Why? Because otherwise we make life difficult for users, and
make
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 7:43 PM
So, two problems:
1. Why is a request for 1.3.22 being redirected to 1.3.23?
Perhaps mod_speling is loaded?
2. Why aren't the 1.3.22 tarballs available somewhere in the
dist tree? Jim?
Because
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suspect something is messed up in your build. f-ctx (and net-c) are both
initialized
in the core_install_transport_filters(conn_rec *c, apr_socket_t *csd) call. It
compiles
and serves pages cleanly for me. Can you verify if
Compiles but not tested.
Bill
Index: proxy_http.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/proxy/proxy_http.c,v
retrieving revision 1.124
diff -u -r1.124 proxy_http.c
--- proxy_http.c 29 Jan 2002 21:08:37 - 1.124
+++
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Compiles but not tested.
it works for me...
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Compiles but not tested.
it works for me...
Just tested it on Windows. Bombs w/o the patch. Ok with. Committing.
Bill
29 matches
Mail list logo
