RE: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Sander Striker
From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 February 2002 08:37 On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:44:19 -0800, Ian Holsman wrote about Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate: I'm still not very happy about compressing EVERYTHING and excluding certain browsers as you would have to exclude IE

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote: On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:44:19 -0800, Ian Holsman wrote about Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate: I'm still not very happy about compressing EVERYTHING and excluding certain browsers as you would have to exclude IE Netscape. so this is a -1 for

Re: 2.0.32 has been released.

2002-02-16 Thread Thom May
The 2.0.32 tarball built and is running very happily on OpenBSD 3.0 and Debian/Linux unstable (2.4 kernel) here, by way of additional confirmation. Cheers, -Thom msg06086/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announcement

2002-02-16 Thread Bill Stoddard
I have a pretty major concern about releasing .32 as a GA product. We haven't had a whole lot of beta's. I would really like to get this beta into a lot of people's hands, and hopefully get our next release to be a GA release. I think that the best way to do this, is to send a message

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Ian Holsman
Igor Sysoev wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote: On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:44:19 -0800, Ian Holsman wrote about Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate: I'm still not very happy about compressing EVERYTHING and excluding certain browsers as you would have to exclude IE Netscape. so this is a -1

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announcement

2002-02-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 12:56 AM On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote: I have one concern about 2.0.32 as a GA candidate. In order to fix the last of the performance problems in 2.0.x, we'll need to incorporate free lists for buckets

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Eli Marmor
Igor Sysoev wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote: ... In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes directive. Here are some recomendations: application/x-javascript NN4 does not

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announcement

2002-02-16 Thread Jeff Trawick
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote: I have one concern about 2.0.32 as a GA candidate. In order to fix the last of the performance problems in 2.0.x, we'll need to incorporate free lists for buckets (the stuff that Cliff is working on). I

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announcement

2002-02-16 Thread Eli Marmor
Ryan Bloom wrote: I have a pretty major concern about releasing .32 as a GA product. We haven't had a whole lot of beta's. I would really like to get this beta into a lot of people's hands, and hopefully get our next release to be a GA release. I think that the best way to do this, is to

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Jeff Trawick
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes directive. Here are some recomendations: This is EXACTLY what we should be doing IMHO. if a person wants to

RE: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Sander Striker
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes directive. Here are some

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announcement

2002-02-16 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 16 Feb 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: It is easy to prevent people from doing the same thing without changing the generated code (move the macro to core.c, rename it to ONLY_LAME_CODE_NEEDS_TO_REMOVE_ZERO_LENGTH_BUCKETS(), whatever floats your boat). Showstopper? No, IMHO. Something to

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Eli Marmor wrote: Igor Sysoev wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote: ... In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes directive. Here are some

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Ian Holsman
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: Wow! Obviously the code/default config need to be extremely conservative! Yes. But browsers change (evolve to better things we hope), so config has my preference. Hardcoding in default rules is badness

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Ian Holsman wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: Wow! Obviously the code/default config need to be extremely conservative! Yes. But browsers change (evolve to better things we hope), so config has my

Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate

2002-02-16 Thread Jeff Trawick
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: Wow! Obviously the code/default config need to be extremely conservative! Yes. But browsers change (evolve to better things we hope), so config has my preference.

Re: 2.0.32 is a beta!

2002-02-16 Thread Austin Gonyou
I'm going to rebuild digitalroadkill.net starting tomorrow night up to RH 7.2 + my own kernel patches + purified gcc/glibc/binutils, etc. I'm also going to move drk to Drupal, instead of PHPNuke. So hopefully, for testing, I'll have everything up late tomorrow night, or the next, Feb 18 GMT

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announceme nt

2002-02-16 Thread Austin Gonyou
is that worker mpm? Just curious On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 13:47, Eli Marmor wrote: Ryan Bloom wrote: ... Being slashdotted, will be also a good heavy-load test for daedalus, which runs 2.0.32... ;-) -- Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO, Founder Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announceme nt

2002-02-16 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 12:34:31AM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: is that worker mpm? Just curious Daedalus (aka www.apache.org) runs FreeBSD. And, FreeBSD's thread support sucks to the point where they are not usable. So, it's running prefork. We had a concerted effort a few months ago by

Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announceme nt

2002-02-16 Thread Austin Gonyou
Ahh..yes..now it's clear. Thx! Well, I'll whack a couple of boxen with ab or httperf and see what I can get out of it on Linux. :) On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 01:28, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 12:34:31AM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: is that worker mpm? Just curious