From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 February 2002 08:37
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:44:19 -0800, Ian Holsman wrote about Re: [PATCH]
mod_deflate:
I'm still not very happy about compressing EVERYTHING and excluding
certain browsers
as you would have to exclude IE
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:44:19 -0800, Ian Holsman wrote about Re: [PATCH]
mod_deflate:
I'm still not very happy about compressing EVERYTHING and excluding
certain browsers
as you would have to exclude IE Netscape.
so
this is a
-1 for
The 2.0.32 tarball built and is running very happily on OpenBSD 3.0 and
Debian/Linux unstable (2.4 kernel) here, by way of additional confirmation.
Cheers,
-Thom
msg06086/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have a pretty major concern about releasing .32 as a GA product. We
haven't had a whole lot of beta's. I would really like to get this beta
into a lot of people's hands, and hopefully get our next release to be a
GA release. I think that the best way to do this, is to send a message
Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:44:19 -0800, Ian Holsman wrote about Re: [PATCH]
mod_deflate:
I'm still not very happy about compressing EVERYTHING and excluding
certain browsers
as you would have to exclude IE Netscape.
so
this is a
-1
From: Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 12:56 AM
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
I have one concern about 2.0.32 as a GA candidate.
In order to fix the last of the performance problems
in 2.0.x, we'll need to incorporate free lists for
buckets
Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote:
...
In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default
text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes
directive. Here are some recomendations:
application/x-javascript NN4 does not
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
I have one concern about 2.0.32 as a GA candidate.
In order to fix the last of the performance problems
in 2.0.x, we'll need to incorporate free lists for
buckets (the stuff that Cliff is working on).
I
Ryan Bloom wrote:
I have a pretty major concern about releasing .32 as a GA product. We
haven't had a whole lot of beta's. I would really like to get this beta
into a lot of people's hands, and hopefully get our next release to be a
GA release. I think that the best way to do this, is to
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default
text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes
directive. Here are some recomendations:
This is EXACTLY what we should be doing IMHO.
if a person wants to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default
text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes
directive. Here are some
On 16 Feb 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
It is easy to prevent people from doing the same thing without
changing the generated code (move the macro to core.c, rename it to
ONLY_LAME_CODE_NEEDS_TO_REMOVE_ZERO_LENGTH_BUCKETS(), whatever floats
your boat). Showstopper? No, IMHO. Something to
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Eli Marmor wrote:
Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Zvi Har'El wrote:
...
In my mod_deflate module (for Apache 1.3.x) I'd enabled by default
text/html only. You can add or remove another type with DeflateTypes
directive. Here are some
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Wow! Obviously the code/default config need to be extremely
conservative!
Yes. But browsers change (evolve to better things we hope), so config has
my preference. Hardcoding in default rules is badness
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Wow! Obviously the code/default config need to be extremely
conservative!
Yes. But browsers change (evolve to better things we hope), so config has
my
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Wow! Obviously the code/default config need to be extremely
conservative!
Yes. But browsers change (evolve to better things we hope), so config has
my preference.
I'm going to rebuild digitalroadkill.net starting tomorrow night up to
RH 7.2 + my own kernel patches + purified gcc/glibc/binutils, etc.
I'm also going to move drk to Drupal, instead of PHPNuke.
So hopefully, for testing, I'll have everything up late tomorrow night,
or the next, Feb 18 GMT
is that worker mpm? Just curious
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 13:47, Eli Marmor wrote:
Ryan Bloom wrote:
...
Being slashdotted, will be also a good heavy-load test for daedalus,
which runs 2.0.32... ;-)
--
Eli Marmor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO, Founder
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 12:34:31AM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
is that worker mpm? Just curious
Daedalus (aka www.apache.org) runs FreeBSD. And, FreeBSD's thread
support sucks to the point where they are not usable. So, it's
running prefork.
We had a concerted effort a few months ago by
Ahh..yes..now it's clear. Thx!
Well, I'll whack a couple of boxen with ab or httperf and see what I can
get out of it on Linux. :)
On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 01:28, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 12:34:31AM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
is that worker mpm? Just curious
20 matches
Mail list logo