httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,
Hi,
I'm trying to configure mod_cache+mod_proxy, but mod_cache is not
working properly. One thing i found strange is that if you look in the
cache directory we have the following strange file permissions:
-rw---1 webu webg 2326 May 22 16:41 wkL1JcPol1pQ.data
--
Tacio A.G. Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'm trying to configure mod_cache+mod_proxy, but mod_cache is not
working properly. One thing i found strange is that if you look in the
cache directory we have the following strange file permissions:
-rw---1 webu webg
Zvi Har'El wrote:
Experimenting with an Apache Proxy, I noticed that in version 1.3 (the latest
cvs snapshot) it behaves in a half-duplex fashion. That is, it doesn't read the
backend server response until it have finished transmitting the client's
request body.
HTTP v1.1 is a half duplex
Zvi Har'El wrote:
Experimenting with an Apache Proxy, I noticed that in version 1.3 (the latest
cvs snapshot) it behaves in a half-duplex fashion. That is, it doesn't read the
backend server response until it have finished transmitting the client's
request body.
HTTP v1.1 is a
Bill Stoddard wrote:
HTTP v1.1 is a half duplex protocol - this is 100% correct behavior.
Where in the spac does it say that?
Half duplex in the sense that a reply follows a request. ie a reply does
not get sent during a request.
(The 100-continue handling I understand is an exception to
At 09:00 AM 5/23/2002, Graham Leggett wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
HTTP v1.1 is a half duplex protocol - this is 100% correct behavior.
Where in the spac does it say that?
Half duplex in the sense that a reply follows a request. ie a reply does
not get sent during a request.
Cannot,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Half duplex in the sense that a reply follows a request. ie a reply does
not get sent during a request.
Cannot, Should not, or generally Does not?
POST accept modules might certainly echo...
Headers:...
Banners of the the next page
Accepting Input ...
Thanks ,
It solved the problem with file permission, but there's still a
problem with the content type.
For example getting a index.html file i get in the first request:
2 Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:14:46 GMT
3 Server: Apache/1.3.23 (Unix) mod_perl/1.26
4 Content-Location: index.html.en
5
Tacio A.G. Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks ,
It solved the problem with file permission, but there's still a
problem with the content type.
Thanks for the quick feedback on my simple fix. Hopefully the smart
people can help you with the content type problem.
--
Jeff Trawick |
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Half duplex in the sense that a reply follows a request. ie a reply does
not get sent during a request.
Cannot, Should not, or generally Does not?
POST accept modules might certainly echo...
Headers:...
Banners of the the next page
Accepting
Hi,
Why do we need to set the content type at cache_storage.c at line
240, i just commented it out and it seems to be working. Sorry about
my ignorance, but may it cause a side effect?
Thanks,
Tacio
PS:
diff -u cache_storage.c-orig cache_storage.c
--- cache_storage.c-origThu May
On Wed, 22 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And Josh and I are suggesting we add -src to the end of every package name
in the source distro directory.
Yes, src would be an improvement. Note that build seems very
ambiguous to me. That could mean stuff you need in order to build, but
it
At 10:46 AM 5/23/2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And Josh and I are suggesting we add -src to the end of every package name
in the source distro directory.
Yes, src would be an improvement. Note that build seems very
ambiguous to me. That could
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 17:58
At 10:46 AM 5/23/2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And Josh and I are suggesting we add -src to the end of every package name
in the source distro directory.
Yes,
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:58:18AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So -win32-build-src isn't terribly ambigious, or should we name it
-win32-make-src, or simply -win32-src?
-0 for *-build-src and *-make-src
+0 for -win32-src only
+1 for httpd-x.y.z-win32-src.zip and httpd-x.y.z-src.tar.gz
-build- and -make- (i.e. including the verb) implies action (as in contains
the results of). I'd suggest sticking to some flavor of src to avoid
ambiguity. What they do with it is their business.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 10:46 AM 5/23/2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2002,
Heads-up. I am backing out this patch to get compiles on NT 4.0 working again.
Bill
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/libhttpd.dsp,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38
---
I suggest we cwd to the server root on startup. We can do this
in the winnt_mpm, or for all platforms in main(). Opinions?
+1 - at least for Windows
And +1 for the rest, or was that simply +0 to do so in main()?
why would we want to chdir() for the other platforms? maybe
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Heads-up. I am backing out this patch to get compiles on NT 4.0 working again.
Is there some reason why xcopy is preferred over copy on Win32? If so,
you can set COPYCMD=/Y. Windows NT should ignore this, but xcopy on
platforms that support the /Y switch will pick it up.
Hello all
httpd-2.0.36, QNX 6.1 RTOS
I have made a modification to apache to get it to run
on qnx. It kept hanging. I traced it down and made
some changes to get it to run. I wanted to proof
these changes with the apache community and get some
feedback as to the longterm consequences/ side
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Here is the commit message for using xcopy:
Tired of 'foo.h not found' messages in the build. Checked ms's docs,
seems xcopy's /y arg goes all the way back to Win95. This shouldn't
introduce any hassles.
I can live with the messages, but not the build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 02/05/23 05:58:38
Modified:.CHANGES
include http_main.h mpm_common.h
server main.c mpm_common.c
server/mpm/prefork mpm.h prefork.c
server/mpm/worker mpm.h worker.c
Log:
Add -k
This patch seems to work ok on both NT 4.0 and 2K. I don't know what's going on with
the
USERDEP change though... (from USERDEP__WIN32 to USERDEP_GEN_T).
Index: libhttpd.dsp
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/libhttpd.dsp,v
Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 02/05/23 05:58:38
Modified:.CHANGES
include http_main.h mpm_common.h
server main.c mpm_common.c
server/mpm/prefork mpm.h prefork.c
See bugzilla id #8464 for details, but currently in 2.0.36 you cannot
specify command-line arguments to an external rewrite program, thus:
RewriteMap prg:/path/to/my/engine -arg1 -arg2
This was valid in 1.3.24, as it exec'd a shell with the -c
/path/to/my/engine -arg1 -arg2 arguments.
Bill Stoddard wrote:
This patch seems to work ok on both NT 4.0 and 2K. I don't know what's going on with
the
USERDEP change though... (from USERDEP__WIN32 to USERDEP_GEN_T).
Does MSVC really spawn a new shell for every command? I wouldn't be
surprised, but if not, the env CMDCOPY should
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:45:03PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slive 02/05/23 11:45:02
...
+pDo not download from www.apache.org. Please use a mirror site
+ to help use save apache.org bandwidth.
+ a href=http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/httpd/;Go
here to find
From: James Tait [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
See bugzilla id #8464 for details, but currently in 2.0.36 you cannot
specify command-line arguments to an external rewrite program, thus:
RewriteMap prg:/path/to/my/engine -arg1 -arg2
This was valid in 1.3.24, as it exec'd a shell with the
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:45:03PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slive 02/05/23 11:45:02
...
+pDo not download from www.apache.org. Please use a mirror site
+ to help use save apache.org bandwidth.
+ a
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:45:03PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slive 02/05/23 11:45:02
...
+pDo not download from www.apache.org. Please use a mirror site
+ to help use save apache.org bandwidth.
should that be help us save?
--
Greg Marr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We thought you
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Jerry Baker wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
+pDo not download from www.apache.org. Please use a mirror site
May I suggest that we put this notice in HEADER.html? Otherwise
it shows up underneath the links that allow downloads from apache.org
directly, which means
This apachectl can supposedly be used to pass anything through to
httpd. Thus, we now have a wrapper script people can use to run httpd
with the proper environment variables.
Existing apachectl keywords are still supported for now (except for
some alternate spellings of startssl -- whats up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+* 37 status: Cliff proposes that 2.0.37 be tagged on Saturday, May 25,
+ with the aim of releasing by Friday, May 31, and volunteers to RM.
I don't think we're ready. The worker MPM deadlocks under load, and
as far as I know there's no patch yet that
On 23 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+* 37 status: Cliff proposes that 2.0.37 be tagged on Saturday, May 25,
+ with the aim of releasing by Friday, May 31, and volunteers to RM.
There are a few outstanding showstoppers listed in the STATUS file,
including one outstanding veto.
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
I don't think we're ready. The worker MPM deadlocks under load, and as
far as I know there's no patch yet that fully solves the problem.
That's why there's a wide gap in there time-frame-wise. We don't *have*
to tag on Saturday, but I'd like us to at
The 1.3.24 patch is in Bugzilla, id #8882, but I thought I'd post it here
for completeness.
The patch adds a new RewriteMap type:
RewriteMap MapName tcp:host:port
Since several child processes can connect to a multi-threaded rewrite
engine at once, RewriteLock is not required, and requests
On 23 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure at what point all of these links got out of date
w.r.t. the stylesheet, but anyway I regenerated them all. This
link seems to work better than the old one, kind of.
Nope. The one with httpd should be correct. I had just forgotten
On 23 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slive 02/05/23 13:16:12
Modified:xdocs/stylesheets project.xml
Log:
My fault: I forgot to commit this when I commited the html transforms
a couple hours ago.
And yes, this link should work.
+ lia
On Thu, 23 May 2002, James Tait wrote:
The 1.3.24 patch is in Bugzilla, id #8882, but I thought I'd post it here
for completeness.
The patch adds a new RewriteMap type:
RewriteMap MapName tcp:host:port
-0 for 1.3.
--Cliff
On 23 May 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Existing apachectl keywords are still supported for now (except for
some alternate spellings of startssl -- whats up with that stuff?).
I always assumed it was for Apache-SSL compatibility. Ben?
--Cliff
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
+ lia href=http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/httpd/;from a
mirror/a/li
Have you tried it? It's nonsensical. It comes up with an httpd/ link,
which when you click on it expands to a httpd/dist/httpd/ link, and you
click on that and get
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I'm not sure where you are getting that. There is a slight problem with
the link to the full list of mirrors (and I'll fix that in a second), but
if it finds mirrors in your country code, then those work fine.
What country code? :)
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I'm not sure where you are getting that. There is a slight problem with
the link to the full list of mirrors (and I'll fix that in a second), but
if it finds mirrors in your country code, then those work
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
Well, if you are coming from .edu, then you should be getting all the
us ones. Is that not working? I can only test from .ca and .org.
Nope. I get:
---
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
Well, if you are coming from .edu, then you should be getting all the
us ones. Is that not working? I can only test from .ca and .org.
Nope. I get:
I can't replicate that. What is the IP address of
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I can't replicate that. What is the IP address of your client?
Perhaps it doesn't have reverse DNS? I'm not sure how the
script would handle that.
That's true, it doesn't. Well, at least not from outside our department.
Friggin bureaucratic DNS
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I can't replicate that. What is the IP address of your client?
Perhaps it doesn't have reverse DNS? I'm not sure how the
script would handle that.
That's true, it doesn't. Well, at least not from
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I believe you need to clear your cache (or shift-reload or whatever). We
are sending an expires header which is probably causing the script with
the broken links to hang around.
Didn't help, sorry. I guess the only way I'm going to figure this out
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:19:09PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
+++ log.c 23 May 2002 12:19:09 - 1.121
...
+bytes_wanted = BUFFER_SIZE;
+endptr = buf = apr_palloc(p, BUFFER_SIZE);
+do {
+bytes_read = bytes_wanted;
+rv =
This is a simpler approach to fixing what I think is the
root cause of the worker deadlocks.
Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker/worker.c,v
retrieving revision 1.125
diff -u
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:25:48PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
Oof... needlessly complicated. Just use apr_file_read_full(). It will return
all the bytes that you ask for, unless an error condition occurs (EOF).
There is no need to do any looping.
You'd have to do a stat() on the file to get the
At 12:11 PM 5/23/2002, you wrote:
Here is the commit message for using xcopy:
Tired of 'foo.h not found' messages in the build. Checked ms's docs,
seems xcopy's /y arg goes all the way back to Win95. This shouldn't
introduce any hassles.
I know... but Win95 was after NT 4.0's cmd
It appears that SSI if statement with regular expressions is broken:
try to serve something like that:
!--#set var=v value=12:34 --
!--#if expr= ${v} = /.*:.*/ --
TRUE
!--#else --
FALSE
!--#endif --
you get: [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Maybe I am missing something
I had submitted patch foir QNX6 twice in the past. There was no ACK and
generally it was ignored. The patch was used for about half a year on public
site without any problems.
-- Igor
- Original Message -
From: Davide Berti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 23,
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
I had submitted patch foir QNX6 twice in the past. There was no ACK and
generally it was ignored. The patch was used for about half a year on public
site without any problems.
You should keep resubmitting (once a week or so)
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:31:45PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:25:48PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
Oof... needlessly complicated. Just use apr_file_read_full(). It will return
all the bytes that you ask for, unless an error condition occurs (EOF).
There is no
57 matches
Mail list logo
