Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm

2002-06-04 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:21:57AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: Cliff is always mentioning something like t/TEST -d gdb or something like that. Won't that run in -X mode automatically? The

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/specweb99/specweb99-2.0 mod_specweb99.c

2002-06-04 Thread Brian Pane
Greg Ames wrote: But I can mention that my very unofficial mini-SPECweb99 runs with the client and server both on my ThinkPad with 100% standard dynamic GETs* show that prefork is the fastest, worker is about 1% slower, and leader is about another 1.5% slower. This is a noticeable improvement

Re: [PATCH] Switch DAV PUT to use brigades

2002-06-04 Thread rbb
+if (APR_BUCKET_IS_EOS(bucket)) { +seen_eos = 1; +break; +} + +/* Ahem, what to do? */ +if (APR_BUCKET_IS_METADATA(bucket)) { +continue; +

Re: [PATCH] Switch DAV PUT to use brigades

2002-06-04 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: No need to test for this. You'll just get zero-length buckets. If an Um, I think the approach has been that you can't read from metadata buckets. That they may give you data back or they may not, but they certainly shouldn't be handled if you

Re: 1.3.25 release status

2002-06-04 Thread Stipe Tolj
Jim Jagielski wrote: There are 2 outstanding questions regarding the Cygwin patches that Stipe submitted, which I would like resolved before the TR. It's also looking like the 2 patches noted in STATUS will *not* be added in. TR set for the morning of June4. I'll check about the

Re: [Bug 9488] - HTTP/0.9 requests spoken on https port returnsHTTP/1.0 response

2002-06-04 Thread Ben Laurie
Ryan Bloom wrote: From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Cliff Woolley wrote: On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: I was actually just about to look at this problem if you are busy. Go for it... I'm working on something else. Perhaps its just me, but I'm amused this is considered a

[PATCH] allow multiple calls to ap_discard_request_body

2002-06-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
This basically just implements what Greg described last night. If HTTP_IN has already sent an EOS bucket up the stack for this request, then it will only ever respond with an EOS for this request. This resolves calling ap_discard_request_body multiple times for the same reques,t, which means

RE: [Bug 9488] - HTTP/0.9 requests spoken on https port returns HTTP/1.0 response

2002-06-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Ryan Bloom wrote: From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Cliff Woolley wrote: On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: I was actually just about to look at this problem if you are busy. Go for it... I'm working on something

RE: help with apache configuration logic...

2002-06-04 Thread Fabien COELHO
Take a look at the worker.c file, worker_pre_config function for an example of how to modify the configuration tree. Ok. I'm going to investigate that. It seems that I'll need to restructure the whole stuff for apache 2 instead of the minimum time port I hopped for initially. Fabien.

[PATCH include/http_log.h] APLOG_TOCLIENT.

2002-06-04 Thread Stas Bekman
I'm not sure whether ap_log_rerror() is the only user of APLOG_TOCLIENT. If so here is the patch that adds the whole story to the header file, so one doesn't need to dig in the .c files to find out how it works. Moreover, I'm still not happy with this description, as ap_log_rerror() doesn't

Re: [PATCH include/http_log.h] APLOG_TOCLIENT.

2002-06-04 Thread Bill Stoddard
Just committed this... diff -u -r1.37 http_log.h --- http_log.h 23 May 2002 12:19:09 - 1.37 +++ http_log.h 4 Jun 2002 19:00:29 - @@ -107,8 +107,17 @@ */ #define APLOG_NOERRNO (APLOG_LEVELMASK + 1) -/* Use APLOG_TOCLIENT to cause ap_log_rerror() to send the message - * to the client

mod_proxy and chunked transfer encoding

2002-06-04 Thread lsanders
I am using Apache 2.0.36 as a reverse proxy to the Jetty java web-server. Everything worked fine, except redirects - they would wait 30 seconds (until Jetty timed out the keep-alive connection), and then Apache processed the redirect correctly. After some debugging, I found that Jetty's redirect

problems building modules with 2.0.36

2002-06-04 Thread Heinrich Götzger
Hi, I discovered problems today with building and compiling some own modules for httpd 2.0.36 on a SuSE 7.2 Box. The Server runs fine. Using apxs brought some things which I'm not clear on (I'm not a perl Guru): $ echo `./apxs -q CC` gcc $ echo `./apxs -q TARGET` httpd ... it goes wrong for

Apache 1.3.25 DOA

2002-06-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Just a quick warning... having cvs up'ed the 1.3 tree, I was loath to discover I've broken my household proxy [which I was just about to try pipelining to with MozRC3.] D:\Apacheapache -k start -n proxyserver Processing config directory: d:/apache Processing config file: d:/apache/Apache.exe

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_main.c

2002-06-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:58 AM 3/13/2002, you wrote: bnicholes02/03/13 07:58:40 Modified:src/main http_main.c Log: Added the -e command line directive for NetWare to force all fatal configuration file errors to the logger screen rather than to the Apache screen. This allows Apache to

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_main.c

2002-06-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:21 PM 6/4/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 10:58 AM 3/13/2002, you wrote: bnicholes02/03/13 07:58:40 Modified:src/main http_main.c Log: Added the -e command line directive for NetWare to force all fatal configuration file errors to the logger screen rather than to

Re: problems building modules with 2.0.36

2002-06-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Heinrich Götzger wrote: Hi, I discovered problems today with building and compiling some own modules for httpd 2.0.36 on a SuSE 7.2 Box. The Server runs fine. Using apxs brought some things which I'm not clear on (I'm not a perl Guru): $ echo `./apxs -q CC` gcc $ echo `./apxs -q

1.3.25 green light again.

2002-06-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
The transposed getopt list containing fF: was the culprit, of course. 1.3.25 rides again. Pipelining to our 1.3.25 proxy appears to work. Bill wrowe 2002/06/04 21:53:15 Modified:src/main http_main.c Log: First, checking for typos like fF: instead of Ff: in the getopt list